PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

A comparative analysis of embedded chatbot models and ChatGPT-4 for answering orthodontic treatment queries

View Full Paper
RKRizwan KhalilLALaiba AminRSRashna Hoshang Sukhia

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate and compare an embedded chatbot model with ChatGPT-4 in delivering orthodontic treatment information.
  • Compared an embedded chatbot model and ChatGPT-4 using standardized orthodontic questions.
  • Responses evaluated by six orthodontic consultants with a 5-point Likert scale.
  • Content validity assessed using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) indices.
  • Statistical analysis performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Shapiro-Wilk test.
  • Embedded chatbot received higher scores in clarity and content validity than ChatGPT-4.
  • Many responses from the embedded model achieved acceptable I-CVI (≥ 0.78) and S-CVI (≥ 0.8).
  • Differences in performance were not statistically significant (p = 0.173).

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an embedded chatbot model in delivering orthodontic treatment-related information and compares its performance with the fourth generation of the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, USA), focusing on accuracy, clarity, relevance, and up-to-date knowledge. An embedded chatbot model, designed specifically for orthodontic treatment-related queries, was integrated into a web-based platform. It was compared with ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, USA) using standardized orthodontic questions. Responses from both models were evaluated by six orthodontic consultants (≥ 5 years of experience) using a 5-point Likert scale. Content validity was assessed using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) content validity indices. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The embedded chatbot demonstrated higher content validity and received better scores in accuracy and clarity compared to ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, USA). A greater number of its responses achieved acceptable I-CVI (≥ 0.78) and S-CVI (≥ 0.8) values. Although the embedded model showed numerical trends favoring its performance over ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI, USA), the differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.173). The embedded chatbot model showed improved clarity and validity in orthodontic responses, suggesting potential advantages of domain-specific embedding and prompt engineering. While performance differences were not statistically significant, the findings support the growing role of tailored artificial intelligence (AI) tools in enhancing patient communication and clinical support in orthodontics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khalil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698be001058ab1890a13b9cbhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39263-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper