PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of artemether lumefantrine vs chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium Vivax infection in Pakistan

View Full Paper
SKSidra Safdar KhanJMJamil MuqtadirSASyed Ashraf Abbas

Key Points

  • This research examines the efficacy of artemether lumefantrine compared to chloroquine for treating Plasmodium vivax infection in Pakistan.
  • Prospective observational cohort study
  • Conducted among 354 malaria patients in Karachi, Pakistan
  • Analyzed recurrence rates at Day 28 and after six months
  • Used Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models
  • Recurrence by Day 28 was 20.2% for AL and 10.2% for CQ
  • Recurrence after six months was 32.2% for AL and 15.3% for CQ
  • Primaquine strategies showed lower recurrence hazards
  • Higher recurrence was associated with AL monotherapy compared to CQ

Abstract

The advancement of malaria control is significant; yet, the presence of drug-resistant malarial parasites remains an issue. In Pakistan, nearly one million malaria cases occur each year. A prospective, observational, cohort study was conducted among 354 malaria patients in Karachi, Pakistan. By Day 28, recurrent Plasmodium vivax infection occurred in 10/98 (10.2%) of participants receiving chloroquine (CQ) monotherapy, 17/84 (20.2%) receiving artemether–lumefantrine (AL) monotherapy, 1/93 (1.1%) receiving CQ plus primaquine (CQ + PQ), and 3/79 (3.8%) receiving AL plus primaquine (AL + PQ). The corresponding Kaplan–Meier cumulative incidence estimates at Day 28 were 13.4% (95% CI 5.6–21.2), 24.5% (95% CI 14.3–34.7), 1.5% (95% CI 0.0–4.4), and 5.3% (95% CI 0.0–11.2), respectively. By the end of six months of follow-up, observed recurrence was 15/98 (15.3%) for CQ, 27/84 (32.2%) for AL, 1/93 (1.1%) for CQ + PQ, and 5/79 (6.3%) for AL + PQ; Kaplan–Meier cumulative incidence estimates were 21.0% (95% CI 11.0–31.0), 39.1% (95% CI 26.7–51.4), 1.5% (95% CI 0.0–4.4), and 10.0% (95% CI 1.6–18.4), respectively. In unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models, AL monotherapy was associated with a higher hazard of recurrence than CQ monotherapy, while primaquine-containing regimens showed lower recurrence hazards than the corresponding monotherapies during follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698be001058ab1890a13ba1ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38713-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper