PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Advances in Structural Engineering0 citations

Rapid seismic performance assessment of existing building structures via field-measured features and ensemble machine learning

View Full Paper
JSJiaZeng ShanCHChenyu HuangCLCheng Ning Loong

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a machine learning framework for assessing the seismic performance of buildings based on field measurements.
  • Conducted ambient-vibration tests to obtain structural data.
  • Utilized various machine learning models to classify seismic performance levels.
  • Adopted a simulated dataset from nonlinear time-history analyses to train the models.
  • Implemented SHAP analyses to identify critical features influencing classification.
  • Validated the method with publicly available data from real-world structures.
  • XGBoost model achieved the highest average F1-score of 0.859 across performance levels.
  • Six critical features were identified as influential in the classification task.
  • Cost-sensitive models showed potential in addressing misclassification consequences.
  • Predictions aligned closely with actual observations from real earthquake assessments.

Abstract

Accurate and timely assessment of structural damage is critical in response to severe earthquake events. To this end, this study proposes a framework integrating ambient-vibration tests, multivariate features, and machine-learning (ML) models. The focus is to examine the capability of various ML models, including decision trees, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosted Machine (LightGBM), and Category Boosting (CatBoost), in classifying the seismic performance levels of buildings. To reduce biases due to imbalanced class distribution, a simulated dataset is adopted to train ML models. Particularly, this dataset is generated from the nonlinear time-history analyses of surrogate structural models, whose dynamic properties are calibrated from prior on-site testing. The analyses show that the XGBoost model mostly outperforms others and achieves an average F1-score of 0.859 across all performance levels in the test sets. Moreover, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses are performed to determine the dominant features for classification task with six critical features identified. The reduced-dimension XGBoost model attains similar average F1-scores as that using all examined features. The study also investigates cost-sensitive models that account for the asymmetrical consequences of performance levels misclassification. Lastly, the proposed method is validated using publicly available data from real-world structures with seismic monitoring and demonstrated for regional real earthquakes and hypothetical seismic risk assessments. The predictions from XGBoost models for real earthquake assessments generally agree with actual observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e07bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/13694332261424055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantum‐enhanced machine learning technique for rapid post‐earthquake assessment of building safety2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Integrating physics-informed machine learning with resonance effect for structural dynamic performance modeling2024 · 34 citations
  3. 3THE EFFECTIVE DURATION OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION1999 · 467 citations
  4. 4Using High‐Resolution Satellite Images for Post‐Earthquake Building Damage Assessment: A Study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat Earthquake2004 · 171 citations
  5. 5XGBoost2016 · 52,531 citations