PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Implementation of Federated Learning for Alzheimer's Disease Classification Using FedAdagrad Algorithm

View Full Paper
AAArini AriniFFFeri FahriantoARAdil Ramadhan

Key Points

  • The research aims to classify Alzheimer’s disease using a federated learning approach, addressing data challenges present in healthcare settings.
  • Implemented federated learning for Alzheimer’s disease classification via FedAdagrad algorithm.
  • Employed a CNN trained on 6,400 MRI images across four severity classes.
  • Data was partitioned non-IID using Dirichlet distributions to simulate real-world data diversity.
  • Conducted experiments using the Flower framework with four clients over ten communication rounds.
  • FedAdagrad achieved an F1-score of 50.33%, outperforming FedAvg’s 48.14%.
  • Both FedAdagrad and FedAvg performed lower than the centralized CNN model, which had a score of 55%.
  • High data heterogeneity (α = 0.1) resulted in a 13.35% decrease in accuracy.
  • Class imbalance significantly impacted all models' performance.

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution for training machine learning models on decentralized data while preserving privacy, making it particularly valuable for sensitive applications such as healthcare. This study implements FL for the classification of Alzheimer’s disease using MRI images, addressing two critical challenges: data heterogeneity and class imbalance. The research evaluates the performance of the FedAdagrad optimization algorithm against the standard FedAvg approach under varying data distribution scenarios. The methodology employs a CNN trained on a dataset of 6,400 MRI images across four severity classes, partitioned non-IID using Dirichlet distributions (α = 0.1, 0.5, 0.9) to simulate real-world heterogeneity. Experiments were conducted using the Flower framework with four clients over ten communication rounds. Results indicate that FedAdagrad achieves a superior F1-score of 50.33% compared to FedAvg’s 48.14%, though both fall short of centralized CNN performance (55%). High data heterogeneity (α = 0.1) leads to a 13.35% accuracy decline, underscoring FL’s sensitivity to uneven data distributions. Class imbalance emerges as the primary bottleneck, affecting all models. The findings contribute to the growing body of research on adaptive optimization in federated settings, offering insights for future improvements in decentralized healthcare AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bff267fb587c655e1c8https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2025.5045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Secure federated learning for Alzheimer's disease detection2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Supervised split federated learning for Alzheimer’s disease classification: an evaluation of deep neural networks2026
  3. 3Performance evaluation of neural networks in federated learning for classification of alzheimer’s disease stages2025
  4. 4Federated learning for cognitive impairment detection using speech data2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Federated Learning for Medical Image Classification: A Comprehensive Benchmark2025