PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology0 citationsOpen Access

The utility of bluetooth and smartphone technology to detect peer contact.

View Full Paper
NBNancy P. BarnettMMMatthew K. MeiselASAlexander W. Sokolovsky

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, functionality, and validity of a Bluetooth-based system for detecting peer proximity among young adults.
  • Participants carried Bluetooth beacons for 3 weeks to detect peer presence.
  • Ecological momentary assessments were used for real-time reporting of peer encounters.
  • Participants provided self-reports indicating peer presence during beacon detection.
  • The system identified 61% of reported peer encounters accurately (true positives).
  • There were 5.6% false positive detections and 39% false negatives attributed to noncompliance.
  • Participant retention and self-report ratings indicated high acceptability of the system.

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults often engage in risk behaviors in close proximity to peers. Detecting peer presence could identify high-risk contexts, but typically relies on self-report, which is prone to bias. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, functionality, and validity of a smartphone-based passive detection system using Bluetooth beacons to identify real-world peer proximity. Twenty-one young adult participants (38% women) and their peers (N = 55; 40% women) completed a 3-week protocol, during which peers carried a small Bluetooth beacon that was detected by participant smartphones. Participants indicated the presence of peers on beacon signal-contingent ecological momentary assessment reports and three daily random reports. Feasibility of participant recruitment was low, primarily due to Android OS updates requiring app revisions that interrupted recruitment. However, feasibility of peer enrollment was high, occurring rapidly but at a lower-than-expected number. Response latencies to signal-contingent and random reports were similar, indicating good feasibility of the ecological momentary assessment report procedures. Acceptability, reflected in high retention for participants and peers, participant self-report ratings, and good ecological momentary assessment report response rates (76%-79%), was high. Functionality was moderate; problems with the app were reported by almost half of participants, and functionality ratings were lower than for acceptability. For validity, the beacon detection technology identified 61% of participant-reported encounters (true positives), with 5.6% false positives. False negatives (39%) were likely due to peer noncompliance or misreporting. Results support the initial utility of Bluetooth-based passive detection for identifying peer presence in real time, offering potential for use in just-in-time interventions targeting health-risk behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barnett et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e70chttps://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000827
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper