PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Tumori Journal0 citations

Attitudes and beliefs of Italian palliative care experts regarding cachexia: A Delphi study

View Full Paper
MMMatteo MoroniEBEduardo BrueraLGLuca Ghirotto

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish consensus among Italian palliative care experts on managing cachexia within palliative care settings.
  • Conducted a two-round Delphi study with 43 Italian palliative care experts.
  • Round 1 involved open-ended questions to generate statements based on literature.
  • Round 2 consisted of rating the generated statements for consensus using a 5-point Likert scale.
  • 82.2% response rate in Round 1 and 95.5% in Round 2.
  • High consensus (⩾90%) was reached on 14 of 28 statements.
  • Unanimous agreement on the importance of multiprofessional management and symptom assessment.

Abstract

Introduction: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome prevalent in advanced illness. Guidelines rarely integrate the relational, multidimensional perspective of palliative care (PC). Addressing this gap is essential to optimize care. To achieve this, national consensus among PC physicians and nurses on principles and priorities for managing cachexia within PC settings is necessary. Methods: A two-round Delphi study was conducted with 43 Italian PC experts (29 physicians, 14 nurses) meeting ⩾10 years’ experience criteria. In Round 1, participants answered open-ended questions informed by literature and a prior exploratory study. Qualitative Framework Method analysis generated 28 statements. In Round 2, statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale; consensus was defined as ⩾90% agreement (scores 4 or 5). Results: Response rates were 82.2% (Round 1) and 95.5% (Round 2). High consensus (⩾90%) from both physicians and nurses was reached for 14 of 28 statements. Unanimous agreement (100%) supported the need for multiprofessional management, assessment of symptom clusters, and reframing the meaning of food in relation to illness stage. Strong agreement was found for dyadic care planning (97.7%), oral care (97.7%), and body image assessment (95.3%). Lower consensus occurred for prioritizing nutritional deficits (55.8%) and routine CRP/prealbumin testing (34.5%), reflecting contextual and prognostic considerations. Conclusions: This study defines core PC-oriented principles for cachexia management: interprofessional collaboration, dyadic engagement, early holistic assessment, and goal-concordant interventions. Findings can inform future clinical guidelines, training, and policy development to address cachexia in advanced illness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moroni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e7dehttps://doi.org/10.1177/03008916261418900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper