PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026eLife1 citationsOpen Access

Mouse sensorimotor cortex reflects complex kinematic details during reaching and grasping

View Full Paper
HGHarrison A. GrierSSSohrab SalimianMKMatthew T. Kaufman

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how the sensorimotor cortex represents detailed movement commands during reaching and grasping actions in mice.
  • Combined high-quality markerless tracking with two-photon imaging during a reach-to-grasp task.
  • Quantified movement-related activity in mouse forelimb motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (S1).
  • Applied linear decoding models to assess joint angle representation in both cortical areas.
  • Both M1-fl and S1-fl showed strong representation of proximal and distal joint angles.
  • Joint angle decoding fidelity was comparable in both M1-fl and S1-fl.
  • M1-fl exhibited early onset of target-specific encoding, while S1-fl's modulation was transient around lift onset.

Abstract

Coordinated forelimb actions, such as reaching and grasping, rely on motor commands that span a spectrum from abstract target selection to detailed instantaneous muscle control. The sensorimotor cortex is central to controlling these complex movements, yet how the detailed command signals are distributed across its numerous subregions remains unclear. In particular, in mice, it is unknown if the primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortices represent low-level joint angle details in addition to high-level signals like movement direction. Here, we combine high-quality markerless tracking and two-photon imaging during a reach-to-grasp task to quantify movement-related activity in the mouse forelimb M1 (M1-fl) and forelimb S1 (S1-fl). Linear decoding models reveal a strong representation of proximal and distal joint angles in both areas, and both areas support joint angle decoding with comparable fidelity. Despite shared low-level encoding, the time course of high-level target-specific information varied across areas. M1-fl exhibited early onset and sustained encoding of target-specific signals, while S1-fl was more transiently modulated around lift onset. These results reveal both shared and unique contributions of M1-fl and S1-fl to reaching and grasping, implicating a more distributed cortical circuit for mouse forelimb control than has been previously considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1ca1267fb587c655f2f0https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.106270.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper