PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Rapid Prototyping Journal0 citations

U-turn precision of robot-based 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite

View Full Paper
QYQu YouZTZhaoyu TiHSHenglun Sun

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve U-turn precision in robotic 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics.
  • Developed a six-axis robotic fused filament fabrication system.
  • Conducted L9(34) orthogonal experiments to evaluate various process parameters.
  • Analyzed fiber bundle shifting and width variation.
  • Achieved 80% reduction in X-direction deviations (from 280 to 32 µm).
  • Identified optimal parameters: 1.5 mm turning radius, 120 mm/min speed, and 60% feeding ratio.
  • Specimens showed average accuracy of 167.9 µm (flat) and 89.6 µm (curved) with edge deviations of ±1.78 mm.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to enhance U-turn precision in robotic three-dimensional (3D) printing of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics for near-net-shape manufacturing by analyzing fiber bundle shifting and width variation to optimize process parameters. Design/methodology/approach A six-axis robotic fused filament fabrication system was developed with a preprinting tool center point calibration method that reduced X-direction deviations by 80% (280→32µm). L9(34)orthogonal experiments evaluated printing speed (120–240 mm/min), turning radius (0.5–1.5 mm), feeding ratio (40%–60%) and retraction control. Findings Turning radius significantly impacted accuracy (p 0.1). Optimal parameters (1.5 mm radius, 120 mm/min speed, 60% feeding, enabled retraction) achieved 244 µm shifting and 0.19% width error. Specimens showed 167.9 µm (flat) and 89.6 µm (curved) average accuracy, with edge deviations reaching ±1.78 mm. Originality/value This study provides practical solutions for high-precision continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites manufacturing and establishes a framework for optimizing robotic 3D printing in aerospace and automotive applications, while guiding future thermal and extrusion research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

You et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1ca1267fb587c655f397https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-05-2025-0197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Robotic 3D Printing of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Thermoset Composites2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Fabrication and Interlaminar Shear Strength of <scp>3D</scp> ‐Printed <scp>CCF</scp> ‐ <scp>PEEK</scp> Rotationally Curved Structures2026
  3. 3Analysis of the Dimensional and Shape Accuracy and Repeatability of Models Produced in the Process of Additive Extrusion of Thermoplastic Polymers Using Fused Filament Fabrication Technology2024
  4. 4Mechanism‐Driven Regulation of Deposition Quality in Additively Manufactured Continuous Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: Balancing Rheology and Geometry2026
  5. 5Mechanical Characterization and Production of Various Shapes Using Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoset Resin-Based 3D Printing2024 · 7 citations