PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Applied Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

Food webs on green roofs are unique but less robust than their ground‐level counterparts

View Full Paper
KPKilian PerreletLCLauren M. CookMCMerin Reji Chacko

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the composition and robustness of food webs on green roofs versus ground-level sites.
  • Environmental DNA metabarcoding was used to analyze soil samples from 52 paired green roof and ground-level sites.
  • Food webs were assessed for compositional and structural differences based on connectance and trophic interactions.
  • Comparison included evaluating the impact of green roof design on food web properties.
  • Food webs on green roofs were found to be distinct and denser compared to ground-level webs.
  • Green roof webs showed increased omnivory and decreased structural coherence, making them more susceptible to secondary extinctions.
  • Older green roofs with deeper substrates supported more robust food webs than newer, shallower ones.

Abstract

Abstract Green roofs are increasingly acknowledged as novel habitats capable of sustaining diverse species assemblages. Due to their distinct abiotic conditions and stochastic colonization pathways, they are hypothesized to support ecological communities that differ from those of ground‐level habitats, yet the capacity of these habitats to sustain coherent and robust food webs is hardly known. Combining environmental DNA metabarcoding from soil samples with a metaweb approach, we compared the composition, structure and robustness of ground‐level and green roof food webs across 52 paired green roof and ground‐level sites along an urban densification gradient in Zurich, Switzerland. Food webs on green roofs were compositionally and structurally distinct from those at ground level. These networks were denser (higher connectance), more diffuse (greater omnivory) and less structured (increased trophic incoherence) than ground‐level webs. Together, this made the food webs on green roofs more prone to secondary extinctions. These patterns were largely driven by the predominance of predators and a lack of basal consumers, such as detritivores. Variation in food web properties was mediated by green roof design. Specifically, older roofs with deeper substrates supported sparsely connected, vertically diverse food webs that exhibited greater robustness to secondary extinctions than more recently built green roofs. Synthesis and applications . Green roofs operate as distinct habitats, offering novel environmental conditions, thus increasing urban habitat diversity and supporting denser but less robust food webs compared with ground‐level habitats. Increasing substrate depth and allowing for long‐term development can promote trophic diversity and robustness, informing strategies for urban biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perrelet et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1cd3267fb587c655f918https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70306
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Applying a method before its proof of concept: A cautionary tale using inferred food webs2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Urbanisation Drives the Decoupling, Simplification, and Homogenization of Aquatic and Terrestrial Food Webs2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Food web robustness depends on the network type and threshold for extinction2025 · 14 citations
  4. 4Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs: the vertical diversity hypothesis2017 · 143 citations
  5. 5The propagation of disturbances in ecological networks2024 · 36 citations