PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026International Journal of Fluid Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of various inlet waveforms on jet impingement heat transfer

View Full Paper
VJVivek Mathew Jose

Key Points

  • This work investigates how various inlet velocity waveforms influence heat transfer in unsteady jets.
  • Experimental and numerical analysis of unsteady jets
  • Analysis of pulse, square, triangular, and sinusoidal waveforms
  • Variation of nozzle-to-surface distance from 2 to 12 and Reynolds number from 5100 to 23000
  • Observation of frequency effects from 0 to 200 Hz
  • Unsteady jets with frequencies over 100 Hz show better performance than steady jets at lower Reynolds numbers.
  • Pulse jets outperform square, triangular, and sinusoidal wave jets in terms of cooling efficiency.
  • Higher Reynolds numbers at low frequencies result in significant cooling decreases compared to steady jets.
  • The presence of secondary vortices improves cooling in wall jet areas for unsteady jets.

Abstract

Effects of various inlet velocity wave patterns on unsteady jet heat transfer on a plane surface are studied experimentally and numerically. The waveforms analyzed include pulse, square, triangular and sinusoidal. The normalized nozzle-to surface-distance Z/D is varied from 2 to 12, the Reynolds number Re from 5100 to 23 000, and the frequency f from 0 to 200 Hz. The performance of unsteady jets is elucidated with the help of the velocity profile and boundary layer. At lower Re, unsteady jets with frequencies exceeding 100 Hz are more effective than steady jets; however, at lower frequencies, the opposite holds true. The frequency should be such that it should disrupt the boundary layer and also maintain a sufficient quantity of cooling fluid near the plate. At low frequencies, a higher jet Re leads to a much greater decrease in cooling compared with a steady jet. Furthermore, this decrease is particularly pronounced at low Z/D. A performance comparison of unsteady jets shows that pulse jets are superior to square wave jets, which in turn outperform triangular wave jets, while sinusoidal wave jets are the least effective. Although unsteady jets at lower frequencies produce less cooling in the stagnation and transition regions compared with steady jets, they offer improved cooling in the wall jet area. The improved cooling is due to the presence of secondary vortices moving away from the surface. The velocity profiles indicate that pulse jets achieve a maximum velocity that surpasses that of steady and other forms of unsteady jets across all r/D values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vivek Mathew Jose (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1d1d267fb587c655fa16https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0305347
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper