PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

The Dawit Isaak Database of Censorship

JBJulia BeckSHSiska HumlesjöKÅKristin Åkerlund

Key Points

  • The central aim is to create a comprehensive database that documents instances of censorship in literature.
  • Developed through collaboration among institutions such as the Dawit Isaak Library and Lund University.
  • Curated 160 titles from a larger collection of approximately 1,200 censored works.
  • Utilized the Omeka-S platform and Linked Open Data principles for structuring the database.
  • Implemented semantic annotation and ensured interoperability with external resources.
  • Linking bibliographic information to specific documented events of censorship.
  • Categorizing censorship events by type, reason, and geographical location.
  • Establishing a public resource for use by educators, journalists, and libraries.
  • Creating a foundation for comparative research on historical and geographical contexts of censorship.

Abstract

This paper introduces the Dawit Isaak Database of Censorship (DIDOC), a pilot initiative designed to advance research on censorship practices through the systematic documentation of banned and suppressed literature. Developed in collaboration among the Dawit Isaak Library, the Gothenburg Research Infrastructure for Digital Humanities (GRIDH), Swedish PEN, and Lund University, the project combines cultural heritage resources, scholarly expertise, and digital infrastructure.DIDOC builds on a curated selection of 160 titles from the Dawit Isaak Library’s larger collection of approximately 1,200 censored works. Each entry links bibliographic information to documented censorship events, categorized by type, reason, and geographical location. Implemented on the Omeka-S platform and structured according to Linked Open Data principles, the database supports semantic annotation, interoperability, and future integration with external resources such as the Norwegian Beacon for Freedom of Expression dataset.The project contributes methodologically by demonstrating how digital infrastructures and metadata standards can be applied to the study of censorship, while also addressing ethical questions concerning data selection, representation, and public accessibility. Beyond its role as a public resource for educators, journalists, and in libraries, DIDOC establishes a foundation for international comparative research on censorship across different historical and geographical contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d445be6419ac0d5225ehttps://doi.org/10.5617/dhnbpub.13025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From invisible to accessible2026
  2. 2Digital Research Infrastructure Webinar Series: Getting to Know CESSDA2026
  3. 3Building Trust in Research and Enhancing Visibility through Persistent Identifiers and Open Metadata2026
  4. 4Empowering Libraries, Archives, and Research Institutions through DOCiD and Open PID Infrastructure2026
  5. 5Stop, Collaborate, and List ‘Em: Creating Local Metadata to Promote User Discovery of Minoritized Identities in a STEM Collection2024 · 2 citations