PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026The Astrophysical Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Mass–Radius Constraints for 2S 0918–549 from an RXTE Superexpansion Burst: A Direct Cooling-tail Analysis

HFHongbin FanHLHelei LiuZLZhaosheng Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to determine the mass and radius of the neutron star 2S 0918–549 through a direct cooling-tail analysis of a superexpansion burst.
  • Applied the direct cooling-tail method to analyze the superexpansion burst.
  • Fitted posttouchdown data within specific flux ratios using atmosphere models.
  • Utilized information-criterion tests to evaluate model efficacy and necessity of heavy-element ashes.
  • Determined a distance of 4.1–5.3 kpc to the neutron star.
  • Established mass constraints of 1–2 solar masses and radius constraints of 9.7–11.9 km with 99% confidence.
  • Confirmed viability of both gravity-bound and self-bound equations of state at the 1 sigma confidence level.

Abstract

Abstract Thermonuclear (Type I) X-ray bursts from accreting neutron stars (NSs) offer a means to determine NS mass ( M ) and radius ( R ) and thereby probe the properties of matter at supranuclear density. A subset of these events, photospheric radius-expansion bursts, provide a particularly powerful tool to constrain the NS M and R . Here, we apply the direct cooling-tail method to 2S 0918−549, using a rare superexpansion burst observed by Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer. We fit only the posttouchdown data within F / F td ∈ 0.6, 0.95, employing modern atmosphere models (pure-He and metal-enriched). The pure-He atmosphere yields a good description of the cooling tail ( χ 2 / ν = 18.12/14), whereas metal-rich models fail; information-criterion tests (Akaike information criterion/Bayesian information criterion) disfavor adding a free absorption edge in every time bin, indicating that heavy-element ashes are unnecessary. The joint fit gives a distance d = 4.1–5.3 kpc and mass–radius constraints M = 1–2 M ⊙ and R = 9.7–11.9 km (99% confidence). These results suggest that representative families of both gravity-bound and self-bound equations of state remain viable at the 1 σ confidence level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d445be6419ac0d523c1https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae3aa7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper