PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning-Identified Potential Interaction Between Clazosentan and Nicardipine in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

YIYusuke InoueMKMasahito KatsukiTHToshikazu Hidaka

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to explore the effectiveness of clazosentan in preventing vasospasm and improving outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  • Analyzed data from the DCI Japan registry (2020-2023)
  • Evaluated associations between clazosentan use and vasospasm outcomes in adults with aSAH
  • Conducted univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors and interactions.
  • Clazosentan was used in 34.0% of patients.
  • Reduced odds of angiographic vasospasm (OR 0.27) and symptomatic vasospasm (OR 0.15) were observed with clazosentan use.
  • Poor outcomes (mRS 3-6) were seen in 33.7% at 6 months.
  • A potential interaction with nicardipine increased odds of angiographic vasospasm (OR 1.85).

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is frequently complicated by cerebral vasospasm (VS). Clazosentan has reduced VS in Japanese studies but shown inconsistent efficacy in Western trials. We hypothesized that clinical and pharmacologic interactions may influence its effectiveness. Methods: We analyzed the multicenter “Database of Cohort Study for Outcome of SAH In Japan” (DCI Japan) registry, prospectively collected from 2020 to 2023, to assess associations between clazosentan use, VS prevention, functional outcomes, and potential interactions in adults with aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) treated by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling within 4 days of onset. Outcomes included angiographic VS (AVS), symptomatic VS (SVS), cerebral infarction, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge and at 6 months. Predictors and interactions were first screened using univariable analysis and Light Gradient Boosting Machine, then evaluated via multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 544 patients (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years; 71.5% female), 34.0% received clazosentan. AVS, SVS, and cerebral infarction occurred in 20.6%, 16.0%, and 22.4%, respectively. Poor outcomes (mRS 3–6) were observed in 48.8% at discharge and 33.7% (137/406) at 6 months. Clazosentan use was associated with reduced odds of AVS (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.69), SVS (OR 0.15 0.04–0.64), and poor 6-month outcome (OR 0.08 0.01–0.68). A potential interaction with nicardipine was linked to higher odds of AVS (OR 1.85 1.43–2.65). Conclusions: Clazosentan was associated with reduced VS and improved 6-month outcomes after aSAH, although concomitant nicardipine may attenuate its prophylactic effectiveness against AVS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Inoue et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d9f5be6419ac0d52b77https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041383
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prediction of three-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation using the CatBoost model2025 · 6 citations
  2. 2Prophylactic management of cerebral vasospasm with clazosentan in real clinical practice: a single-center retrospective cohort study2024 · 29 citations
  3. 3The interdependence of endothelin-1 and calcium: a review2010 · 49 citations
  4. 4A new method for exploring gene–gene and gene–environment interactions in GWAS with tree ensemble methods and SHAP values2021 · 65 citations
  5. 5Risk Factors for the Development of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2024 · 25 citations