PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society1 citations

Optimization of data integration for ultra‐trace zinc isotope ratio analysis by continuous heating thermal ionization mass spectrometry with single‐collector sequential detection

View Full Paper
JPJong‐Ho Park

Key Points

  • The research aims to optimize data integration methods for ultra-trace zinc isotope analysis using thermal ionization mass spectrometry.
  • Used continuous heating TIMS for isotopic analysis of zinc at ultra-trace levels.
  • Evaluated three integration methods: summed intensities, simple averaging, and intensity-weighted averaging.
  • Investigated four integration ranges based on maximum 64Zn+ intensity.
  • Methods I (summed intensities) and III (intensity-weighted averaging) provided higher precision and acceptable accuracy.
  • Method II (simple averaging) showed poor precision with large deviations, improving with reduced integration ranges.
  • Optimal data treatment involves Methods I or III with integration ranges of 'over 25%' for best analytical performance.

Abstract

Abstract The thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) coupled with the continuous heating method was applied to the isotopic analysis of Zn at an ultra‐trace level (1 ng) using the certified reference material IRMM‐3702. Because nanogram‐level Zn produces weak ion signals that require single secondary electron multiplier (SEM) sequential detection, a detailed evaluation of data treatment procedures was carried out to secure high analytical performance. Three integration methods (summed intensities, simple averaging, and intensity‐weighted averaging) were experimentally evaluated for four integration ranges defined relative to the maximum 64 Zn + intensity (full, “over 1%”, “over 25%”, and “over 75%”). The results showed that the analytical performance (accuracy, precision, and uncertainty) is strongly affected by both the integration method and the integration range. Method I (summed intensities) and Method III (intensity‐weighted averaging) produced isotope ratios with relatively high precision and acceptable accuracy, while Method III showed slightly better analytical performance compared to Method I. Method II (simple averaging) produced large deviations and poor precision when applied to the full range, although the analytical performance improved when reduced integration ranges were applied. These findings indicate that the optimized data treatment procedure for the continuous heating TIMS analysis of Zn isotopes is the use of Method I or III with the integration ranges of “over 25%”, as they yield comparable analytical performance in this range. The results establish a methodological procedure for accurate and precise Zn isotope ratio measurements at ultra‐trace levels, extending the applicability of TIMS as a competitive tool for geochemical, environmental, and biomedical research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jong‐Ho Park (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6dd15be6419ac0d5301dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.70120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper