PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026BRQ Business Research Quarterly0 citationsOpen Access

Board Diversity and Corporate Social Irresponsibility

View Full Paper
CSCAROLINA BONA SÁNCHEZGCGema del C Fleitas CastilloJAJERÓNIMO PÉREZ ALEMÁN

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine how board diversity influences corporate social irresponsibility in organisations.
  • Analyzed a sample of Spanish firms listed from 2014 to 2022.
  • Evaluated relationships between board diversity and corporate actions.
  • Used statistical methods to assess the impact of diversity on socially irresponsible practices.
  • Found a negative correlation between board diversity and corporate social irresponsibility.
  • Indicated that diverse boards promote a more ethical corporate culture.
  • Demonstrated that diversity helps protect directors' reputational capital.

Abstract

Our study aims to examine the impact of board diversity on socially irresponsible actions (corporate social irresponsibility CSI). Using a sample of Spanish firms listed from 2014 to 2022, our results evidence a negative effect of diversity on CSI. This suggests that diversity in corporate decision-making promotes a more ethical and accountable organisational culture. Our research has significant implications for internal agents, since incorporating board diversity emerges as an effective instrument that can constrain CSI practices. Moreover, diversity is an advantage for directors who are sensitive to threats to their reputational capital. By reducing CSI, directors consolidate their reputation as trusted overseers, which in turn protects their current and potential appointments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G34: M14

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

SÁNCHEZ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e2a5be6419ac0d539a0https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416939
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper