PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Prediction of Red Tide Events in the Philippines using MODIS-derived Oceanographic Parameters and XGBoost

CAChristian Angelo P. ArellanoACAlthea Andrienne C. CastilloATA. M. Tamondong

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a predictive model for red tide events in the Philippines using oceanographic parameters.
  • Utilized MODIS-derived oceanographic parameters from 2003-2021
  • Integrated historical data from BFAR for model training
  • Applied the XGBoost algorithm for predictive modeling
  • Evaluated model performance using accuracy, F1-score, and AUC metrics
  • Final model achieved accuracy of 58% and F1-score of 59%
  • Chlorophyll-a and Kd(490) identified as the most influential features
  • Model performance varied across different FMAs and seasons
  • Best results were found in FMA 7, with poorer performance in FMAs 10 and 11

Abstract

Abstract. Red tide, a commonly used misnomer for HABs in the Philippines, poses a significant threat to the environment, fisheries, and public health. Since current red tide detection methods, such as in-situ sampling, are mostly reactive and usually result in delayed issuance of advisories, this study developed a model for predicting red tide occurrences in the Philippines using XGBoost and MODIS-derived oceanographic parameters. Five key parameters, namely Chlorophyll-a (chl-a), Sea Surface Temperature (SST), Photosynthetically Available Radiation (PAR), Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient (Kd(490)), and Particulate Backscattering Coefficient (bbp(443)), were extracted from MODIS Aqua 8-day composite products spanning 2003 to 2021. These were integrated with historical data from BFAR, covering the same period, to train a predictive model using the XGBoost algorithm. The final model demonstrated moderate performance as reflected in its accuracy (58%), F1-score (59%), and AUC (61%), with chl-a and Kd(490) as the most influential features based on their SHAP values. Its precision and recall of 58-59% showed its balanced predictive ability across classes, namely, banned and lifted. Model performance across different FMAs and seasons varied due to factors, such as minor variation in parameter values across adjacent FMAs and seasons, missing pixel values of crucial parameters, mismatched parameter values and red tide-linked conditions, and unevenly distributed training data. Among all, the model produced the most reliable and representative results in FMA 7, and the poorest in FMAs 10 and 11.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arellano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e4a5be6419ac0d53ed8https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-5-w4-2025-51-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper