PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Cost of illness of Mycoplasma genitalium in Australia: an incidence-based approach incorporating resistance-guided therapy

View Full Paper
QCQinglu ChengUNSW SydneyCWCaroline G. WattsThe University of SydneyRARabiah Al AdawiyahMelbourne Health

Key Points

  • This study aims to measure the economic burden of Mycoplasma genitalium by comparing resistance-guided therapy and non-resistance-guided therapy.
  • Utilized an incidence-based approach from a healthcare sector perspective
  • Examined two management strategies: resistance-guided therapy (RGT) and non-resistance-guided therapy (non-RGT)
  • Developed a decision tree model to analyze clinical pathways in different populations including women and men who have sex with men and women
  • The economic burden for women was AUD 249 for RGT compared to AUD 283 for non-RGT
  • For men who have sex with men (MSM), costs were AUD 240 under RGT and AUD 279 under non-RGT
  • Non-RGT for men who have sex with women (MSW) costs an additional AUD 23
  • Overall costs were lower with RGT, demonstrating both economic savings and improved clinical management.

Abstract

As macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) becomes more prevalent, resistance-guided therapy (RGT) for MG has been recommended in clinical guidelines to improve first-line antibiotic selection and increase cure rates. This study adopted an incidence-based approach and a healthcare sector perspective to measure the cost of illness of MG in Australia. Two management strategies, RGT and non-RGT, were examined. A decision tree model was developed to replicate the clinical pathways among non-pregnant women, men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who have sex with women (MSW). The burden of managing a woman diagnosed with MG was lower under RGT compared to non-RGT (AUD 249 vs. 283). For MSM, the expected per-person cost was AUD 240 and AUD 279 under RGT and non-RGT. For MSW, non-RGT would cost an additional AUD 23. Overall, this study found that the economic burden of MG under RGT is lower than under non-RGT for both women and men in Australia. RGT offers cost savings while improving MG clinical management and helping to slow the spread of macrolide resistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e6e5be6419ac0d541e1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36992-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper