PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Magnetic Resonance in Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Spatiotemporal Encoding With Nonlinear Gradient Hardware Using Pulseq: From Principles to Practical Demonstration

View Full Paper
AHAndreas HollFZFrank ZijlstraMZMaxim Zaitsev

Key Points

  • The study aims to establish the theoretical and practical foundation for spatiotemporal encoding using nonlinear gradient hardware.
  • Developed a quadratic phase profile using chirped-RF pulses and constant gradients.
  • Implemented a custom matrix gradient coil for quadratic phase generation.
  • Integrated techniques into spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequences with Pulseq.
  • Conducted phantom imaging experiments on a 3T MRI system.
  • Successfully generated the required quadratic phase profile with the nonlinear gradient coil.
  • Achieved images of comparable quality to conventional methods.
  • Mitigated safety and timing limitations associated with chirped-RF pulses.

Abstract

Purpose Provide the theoretical foundation and the first practical demonstration of spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN) using additional nonlinear gradient hardware. Methods The quadratic phase profile can be generated either by a chirped‐RF pulse combined with a constant gradient or, directly, by a quadratic gradient pulse. Both a conventional chirped‐RF and a novel SPEN method using a custom‐built matrix gradient coil for quadratic phase generation were implemented and integrated into a spin‐echo echo‐planar‐imaging (SE‐EPI) sequence using Pulseq. The methods were compared through phantom imaging experiments performed on a 3T MRI system. Results The required quadratic phase profile for SPEN was successfully generated using the nonlinear gradient coil, resulting in images of comparable quality. This quadratic gradient‐based approach was achieved while exploiting the advantages of SPEN and overcoming current SAR and minimal TE limitations arising from the use of chirped‐RF pulses. Conclusion The generation of the SPEN‐defining quadratic phase using nonlinear gradients is an advantageous alternative to conventional methods. This approach enables improved clinical applicability of SPEN, particularly for 3D and high‐field MRI, by mitigating critical safety and timing limitations. Additionally, an implementation of the conventional method is provided open‐source to support further research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e7b5be6419ac0d5444dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70277
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Spatiotemporal encoding MRI in a portable low‐field system2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Parametric analysis of the spatial resolution and signal‐to‐noise ratio in super‐resolved spatiotemporally encoded (SPEN) MRI2013 · 37 citations
  3. 3Reducing SAR requirements in multislice volumetric single‐shot spatiotemporal MRI by two‐dimensional RF pulses2016 · 11 citations
  4. 4Spatio-temporal encoding by quadratic gradients in magnetic resonance imaging2020 · 1 citations
  5. 5Parallel imaging in non-bijective, curvilinear magnetic field gradients: a concept study2008 · 150 citations