PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Exploration0 citationsOpen Access

Catalyst Functionalization for Elevating Performance in Ammonia Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells via Relay Thermo‐Electrocatalysis

View Full Paper
HFHuihuang FangZWZefeng WangJCJianzhong Chen

Key Points

  • Investigate the effect of catalyst functionalization on the performance of ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells.
  • Utilized relay thermo-electrocatalysis strategy for catalyst functionalization.
  • Synthesize Ru/CZ4 catalyst for enhanced ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells.
  • Conduct experiments comparing peak power density with bare cells.
  • Achieved peak power density of 615 mW cm−2 using H2 and 576 mW cm−2 with NH3.
  • Demonstrated 1.8-fold and 2.0-fold increases in peak power density for H2 and NH3 respectively compared to bare cells.
  • Found ammonia-to-hydrogen peak power density ratio to be 93.7%.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Direct ammonia proton ceramic fuel cell is one of the most attractive strategies for ammonia to power at intermediate temperatures (400°C–600°C). Yet, it still remains greatly challenging, involving complex and sluggish processes, such as ammonia oxidation, ammonia decomposition (ADR), and hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR), which always proceeds with high overpotential and low current density. Herein, we adopt the relay thermo‐electrocatalysis strategy via catalyst functionalization for enhancing the performance of NH 3 ‐PCFCs, where ammonia undergoes ADR at the catalytic layer and then enters the anode to undergo HOR. The strategy not only promotes the performance of NH 3 ‐PCFCs (in the case of H 2 and NH 3 ) but also enhances the absolute performance in the same fuel gas compared with bare cells. The Ru/CZ4 was synthesized for catalyst functionalization for enhanced NH 3 ‐PCFCs and a general principle for designing well‐matched catalysts was proposed. Indeed, the peak power density (PPD) of Ru/CZ4 cell achieves 615 and 576 mW cm − 2 for using H 2 and NH 3 , respectively, which are 1.8‐ and 2.0‐fold higher than bare cells (327 and 283 mW cm − 2 for using H 2 and NH 3 ). Additionally, the ammonia‐to‐hydrogen PPD ratio reaches to 93.7%, revealing the superior performance in both H 2 and NH 3 fuels. Furthermore, the detailed experiments and discussion were conducted to gain insight into the incorporated anode for the superior performance of NH 3 ‐PCFC. This research offers valuable insights into the structural design and performance optimization of solid oxide fuel cells using hydrogen‐rich fuels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6ebb5be6419ac0d54828https://doi.org/10.1002/exp.20240431
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper