PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Philosophies2 citationsOpen Access

What Artificial Intelligence May Be Missing—And Why It Is Unlikely to Attain It Under Current Paradigms

PSPavel Straňák

Key Points

  • The article investigates the limitations of current artificial intelligence methodologies in achieving genuine understanding and consciousness.
  • Employs comparative ontological analysis based on philosophy of mind and cognitive science.
  • Utilizes concepts like abduction and tacit knowledge to explore AI's limitations.
  • Examines literature on consciousness and biological autonomy to support arguments.
  • Identifies key characteristics of consciousness and autonomy that AI lacks.
  • Argues that existing models may overlook essential principles found in biological systems.
  • Calls for a new paradigm that transcends current AI approaches to include a deeper understanding of intelligence and consciousness.

Abstract

Contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) achieves remarkable results in data processing, text generation, and the simulation of human cognition. However, it appears to lack key characteristics typically associated with living systems—consciousness, autonomous motivation, and genuine understanding of the world. This article critically examines the possible ontological divide between simulated intelligence and lived experience, using the metaphor of the motorcycle and the horse to illustrate how technological progress may obscure deeper principles of life and mind. Drawing on philosophical concepts such as abduction, tacit knowledge, phenomenal consciousness, and autopoiesis, the paper argues that current approaches to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) may overlook organizational principles whose role in biological systems remains only partially understood. Methodologically, it employs a comparative ontological analysis grounded in philosophy of mind, cognitive science, systems theory, and theoretical biology, supported by contemporary literature on consciousness and biological autonomy. The article calls for a new paradigm that integrates these perspectives—one that asks not only “how to build smarter machines,” but also “what intelligence, life, and consciousness may fundamentally be,” acknowledging that their relation to computability remains an open question.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pavel Straňák (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6ebb5be6419ac0d5482chttps://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11010020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper