PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Microbial Genomics0 citationsOpen Access

Sequence type and strain-level detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae in culture-enriched bacterial metagenomes: comparative performance of mSWEEP and StrainGE bioinformatic tools

View Full Paper
DBDorota BuczekWKWasifa KabirKLKenneth Lindstedt

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the performance of mSWEEP and StrainGE in detecting sequence types of Klebsiella pneumoniae in culture-enriched samples.
  • Comparison of mSWEEP and StrainGE bioinformatic tools for sequence type detection
  • Analysis involved culture-enriched sweep metagenomes and single-colony whole-genome sequencing (WGS)
  • Examined ST detection accuracy and within-sample ST diversity
  • Both mSWEEP and StrainGE showed high accuracy in detecting STs, with mSWEEP detecting STs in 46/49 and StrainGE in 44/49 samples
  • Detected within-sample ST diversity in 19 samples using mSWEEP and 15 samples using StrainGE
  • StrainGE reconstructed phylogenetic relationships for 2/3 STs tested, showcasing its capability beyond mere identification

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major cause of human infections and is frequently associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Carriage of K. pneumoniae in the gut is a major risk factor for infection and a reservoir for the spread of high-risk clonal lineages and associated AMR determinants. Accurate detection of K. pneumoniae at the subspecies level is therefore essential to better understand K. pneumoniae gut colonization ecology and clonal dissemination. We analysed two recently developed bioinformatic tools, mSWEEP and StrainGE, for sequence type (ST) detection of K. pneumoniae in culture-enriched sweep metagenomes compared to single-colony whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We show that both mSWEEP and StrainGE perform highly accurate ST detection, concordant with culture in 46/49 and 44/49 samples with WGS-detected single STs, respectively, as well as in 2/3 samples with two WGS-detected STs. Within-sample ST diversity was detected in 19 and 15 samples by mSWEEP and StrainGE, respectively, highlighting a major advantage of these tools over conventional single-colony WGS. StrainGE could also reconstruct accurate phylogenetic relationships between strains of the same ST for 2/3 different STs tested. Additionally, assembly of the genomes provides better resolution of ST detection by mSWEEP. Together, our results show that both mSWEEP and StrainGE are accurate tools for the detection and analysis of K. pneumoniae STs from mixed bacterial samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buczek et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6eca5be6419ac0d54aa7https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001638
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper