PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026PLOS Global Public Health1 citationsOpen Access

A deep dive into Brazilian health technology assessment: Structure, policies, and processes

MAMohammed AlkhaldiMMMárcia MatosASAli Sweid

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze Brazil's health technology assessment structure, barriers, and opportunities for improvement.
  • Mixed-methods approach conducted from 2021 to 2023
  • Thirteen electronic surveys targeting HTA-related organizations
  • Nine virtual in-depth interviews with HTA policy experts
  • Strong presence of public-sector and academic institutions in Brazil's HTA landscape
  • Recognition of HTA's value and CONITEC's role in evidence coordination
  • Identified challenges like conflicts of interest and funding dependence
  • Emphasis on the need for improved HTA skills and resources

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide face mounting pressures from aging populations, costly medical technologies, and rising healthcare expenditures. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has emerged as a critical tool for improving efficiency and supporting evidence-informed resource allocation through systematic evaluation. In Brazil, HTA plays a central role in advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC), particularly through the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde – CONITEC). As HTA continues to evolve in Brazil, there is an increasing need for health policy and systems research to better understand its structure, challenges, and opportunities. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the key pillars of Brazil’s national HTA system, identify existing barriers, and propose strategies to strengthen HTA processes. A mixed-methods approach was employed between 2021 and 2023, targeting HTA-related organizations and experts across multiple health sectors. Data were collected through thirteen electronic institutional surveys assessing technical aspects of HTA and nine virtual in-depth interviews exploring HTA from a policy perspective. Findings indicate a strong presence of public-sector and academic institutions within Brazil’s HTA landscape, alongside broad recognition of HTA’s value and CONITEC’s central role in coordinating evidence generation and appraisal. However, challenges such as potential conflicts of interest and reliance on exclusive government funding were identified, underscoring the need for more diversified and sustainable financing mechanisms. The system benefits from a multidisciplinary workforce and active community participation, and HTA evidence is widely used in policymaking, particularly in evaluating clinical effectiveness, costs, and economic value. Despite these strengths, limitations persist, including insufficient institutional capacity, resource constraints, and political support. Participants emphasized the need to strengthen HTA skills, competencies, and coordination to improve the effectiveness and impact of HTA processes. This study contributes to the limited literature on Brazil’s HTA system and provides evidence to inform future research and policy efforts aimed at strengthening HTA integration in support of UHC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alkhaldi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54ba0https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005914
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization2017 · 12,144 citations
  2. 2World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki2013 · 30,631 citations
  3. 3Integrating Technology Assessment and Medical Practice Evaluation into Hospital Operations1990 · 12 citations
  4. 4Administrative Data Linkage in Brazil: Potentials for Health Technology Assessment2019 · 90 citations
  5. 5SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies2021 · 222 citations