PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026AIP Advances0 citationsOpen Access

High-frequency switching in superparamagnetic magnetic tunnel junctions by enhancing damping

View Full Paper
QJQi JiaJWJian-Ping Wang

Key Points

  • This research explores how magnetic damping impacts thermal switching rates in superparamagnetic magnetic tunnel junctions.
  • Conducted macrospin simulations to assess magnetic damping's role in switching rates.
  • Compared two control mechanisms: spin-transfer torque (STT) and voltage-controlled exchange coupling (VCEC).
  • Analyzed the effects of enhanced damping on escape rates over energy barriers.
  • Enhanced damping accelerates switching rates by increasing escape rates.
  • STT-based switching is suppressed at high damping levels.
  • VCEC maintains high control efficiency despite enhanced damping, unlike STT.

Abstract

Superparamagnetic magnetic tunnel junctions (sMTJs) are promising components for true random number generation and probabilistic computing. Achieving high-frequency fluctuation while maintaining reliable control over output level is critical for applications. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of magnetic damping in regulating thermal switching rates using macrospin simulations. We show that enhanced damping accelerates the switching rate by increasing the escape rate over the energy barrier. We further compare two control mechanisms: spin-transfer torque (STT) and voltage-controlled exchange coupling (VCEC). Our results reveal that STT-based switching is strongly suppressed under high damping, whereas VCEC, by reshaping the energy landscape without relying on torque-driven dynamics, retains high control efficiency. These findings suggest that enhanced damping not only enables faster stochastic switching in sMTJs but also makes VCEC inherently better suited than STT for high-frequency applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54c06https://doi.org/10.1063/9.0000990
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Voltage Controlled Interlayer Exchange Coupling and Magnetic Anisotropy Effects in Perpendicular Magnetic Heterostructures2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Energy-Efficient Stochastic Signal Manipulation in Superparamagnetic Tunnel Junctions via Voltage-Controlled Exchange Coupling2025 · 11 citations
  3. 3Sub-ns Switching and Cryogenic-Temperature Performance of Mo-Based Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions2022 · 16 citations
  4. 4Spin–orbit torque-induced magnetization switching in Pt/Co–Tb/Ta structures2021 · 26 citations
  5. 5Low-Energy Truly Random Number Generation with Superparamagnetic Tunnel Junctions for Unconventional Computing2017 · 176 citations