PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026AIP Advances0 citationsOpen Access

Quantifying magnetic degradation in laser-cut electrical steel: A domain-level study with angle-dependent magnetization

View Full Paper
RSRawal ShahbazCZChanggeng ZhangHFHina Fatima

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand how laser cutting affects the magnetic properties of electrical steel.
  • Examined magnetic domains on non-oriented silicon steel surfaces
  • Magnetization conducted at various angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°)
  • Used magneto-optic Kerr effect methods to analyze local hysteresis properties
  • Laser cutting caused variations in domain orientations along the cutting edge
  • Core losses increased, with hysteresis loss at the cutting edge 10% higher in the longitudinal direction
  • Transverse direction losses at the cutting edge were 1.5 times higher than the center

Abstract

Laser cutting is an accurate and popular manufacturing process as it is largely employed in most industries in cutting and shaping materials, including electrical steel parts. Nevertheless, laser cutting in the production of motor cores attracts concern regarding its effects to the materials. The resulting localized thermal effects in the cutting can cause mechanical stresses which can also influence the magnetic properties of the electrical steel. In this study, magnetic domains, and their evolution on the magnetic properties of magnets on the surface of non-oriented silicon steel are explored. The magnetization has been carried out at different angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°) to examine local hysteresis properties by magneto-optic Kerr effect methods. Findings indicate that laser cutting causes variations in domain orientations along the cutting edge, more core losses and reduced magnetic susceptibility. Hysteresis loss was observed at the cutting edge 10% higher in the longitudinal direction than loss in the center sample. The loss experienced around the cutting edge in the transverse directions is also 1.5 times the loss experienced at the center, in which case, this means that the energy loss is significantly large. These results indicate that the cutting edge can undergo various changes in microstructural or stress microstructure, as compared to the sheet of the center.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shahbaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6eeb5be6419ac0d54ea0https://doi.org/10.1063/9.0000978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper