PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Human Values1 citations

Metareflections on Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya’s Bhagvadgītā Vicāra : A Critical Review Through D. K. Mohanta’s Translation

View Full Paper
RRajan

Key Points

  • The aim is to critically assess Bhattacharyya’s interpretations of the Bhagavadgītā and the implications of knowledge, action, and devotion.
  • Review of Bhattacharyya’s thematic interpretations of the Bhagavadgītā
  • Analysis of D. K. Mohanta’s English translation
  • Exploration of philosophical, cultural, and textual aspects of the text
  • Discussion of the translator's acknowledgment of the original text's incompleteness
  • Identified the central thesis that knowledge is superior to action and devotion in Bhattacharyya’s view.
  • Highlighted the philosophical dilemmas presented in the Bhagavadgītā.
  • Discussed potential for further research stemming from Bhattacharyya’s interpretations.

Abstract

This review article critically studies Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya’s (KCB) Bhagavadgītā Vicāra using D. K. Mohanta’s English translation from Bengali, published by the Indian Council of Philosophical Research. The article can be considered a metareflection, as it researches into the KCB’s reflections and interpretation of the Bhagavadgītā thematically rather than chronologically. Utilizing Mohanta’s translation, the article scrutinizes the gradations of Bhattacharyya’s interpretation. It explores the philosophical, cultural and textual aspects, highlighting how this analysis can open up new avenues for further research. Principally, we aim to address the issue of ontic value-preference and dilemma in the Bhagavadgītā and Bhattacharyya’s assertion that jñāna knowledge is superior to karma action and bhakti devotion. Likewise, following the humility of the translator who accepted that the original manuscript was received incomplete for unknown reasons, we shall create the hermeneutic scope to interpret its full version or at least to make sense of the same.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rajan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f0d5be6419ac0d55152https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858261420584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Making of Contemporary Indian Philosophy and Dilemmas of Demanded Change: A Critical Study of Swaraj in Light of Neo-Vedanta2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2The Bhagavadgita in the Nationalist Discourse2011 · 29 citations
  3. 3Search for the Absolute in Neo-Vedanta1976 · 85 citations
  4. 4Weaving Together the Ancient and the Contemporary: Intersections of the Bhagavad Gita with Modern Psychology2023 · 26 citations
  5. 5A Review of “The Making of Contemporary Indian Philosophy: Krishnachandra Bhattacharyya”2023 · 6 citations