PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2 citationsOpen Access

Scale and Aggregation Effects of MAUP on Built-Up Area Concentration: Evidence from the Łódź Metropolitan Area

MNMarta Nalej

Key Points

  • The aim is to quantify how data scale and areal unit configuration affect built area concentration in Łódź.
  • Analyzed harmonized land cover datasets at scales of 1:10,000 and 1:100,000.
  • Utilized regular square and hexagonal grids of various sizes alongside irregular cadastral units.
  • Measured concentration using a Lorenz curve-based coefficient and assessed sensitivity using the coefficient of variation.
  • Coarser-scale data produced consistently higher and more variable concentration coefficients.
  • Larger areal units led to a systematic decrease in measured concentration.
  • Differences in unit geometry and location had a minor effect on concentration values.
  • Irregular cadastral units improved interpretability but did not reduce susceptibility to MAUP.

Abstract

Spatial analyses of built-up areas based on aggregated land cover data are inherently affected by the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). This study quantifies the influence of the data scale and the areal unit configuration on Lorenz-based measures of the concentration of the built area. Using Łódź Metropolitan Area (Poland) as a case study, harmonized land cover datasets at scales of 1:10,000 and 1:100,000 were analysed with regular square and hexagonal grids of varying sizes, as well as irregular cadastral units. Concentration was measured using a Lorenz curve-based coefficient and sensitivity to zonation was assessed using the coefficient of variation. The results show that the data scale is the primary determinant of the concentration values, with coarser-scale data consistently producing higher and more variable coefficients. Increasing the size of the areal unit leads to a systematic decrease in the concentration measured, while differences in unit geometry and location exert a comparatively minor influence. Irregular cadastral units improve spatial interpretability, but do not reduce susceptibility to MAUP. The findings confirm the strong scale dependency of concentration measures and highlight the necessity of multiscale approaches in quantitative analyses of built-up areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marta Nalej (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f5f5be6419ac0d55329https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15020072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper