PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2016EuroIntervention74 citations

Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial

View Full Paper
AKA. Pieter KappeteinPSPatrick W. SerruysJSJoseph F. Sabik

Key Result

The EXCEL trial aims to compare the effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease.

Structured PICO

Does PCI using everolimus-eluting stents improve outcomes compared to CABG in patients with left main coronary artery disease with low and intermediate SYNTAX scores?

P
Population
Patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) with low and intermediate SYNTAX scores
I
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using everolimus-eluting stents (XIENCE CoCr-EES)
C
Comparator
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)

The EXCEL trial is designed to compare PCI with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG in patients with left main coronary artery disease and low to intermediate SYNTAX scores.

Abstract

The EXCEL study will define the contemporary roles of CABG and PCI using XIENCE CoCr-EES in patients with LMCAD disease with low and intermediate SYNTAX scores.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kappetein et al. (2016) studied this question. The EXCEL trial aims to compare the effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698e1aaed024768a810c7889https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv12i7a141
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper