PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

Elimination of invisible boundaries of domestic violence tolerance in the criminal law (based on the example of the Republic of Kazakhstan)

View Full Paper
KSKurmangaly SarykulovKUKanat UtarovGMGulmira Meirkulova

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify necessary reforms in Kazakhstan's criminal law to better protect victims of domestic violence.
  • Analyzed statistical data on domestic violence prevalence
  • Compared national laws with international standards
  • Reviewed legislative practices of other countries
  • Examined the current state of criminal law in Kazakhstan
  • Proposed distinguishing between stranger violence and domestic violence in criminal law
  • Recommended new offences like forced marriage and pushing
  • Advocated for banning repeated mediation in domestic violence cases
  • Suggested extending sexual harassment laws to all victims, not just minors

Abstract

Domestic violence is a serious social problem in Kazakhstan. However, such violence has not been given priority in the criminal law. The absence of full criminal law prohibitions of domestic violence creates invisible boundaries of tolerance for it, which consequently merits serious consideration and analysis. This study provides a deeper understanding of the necessary changes in criminal law that affect the protection of women (girls) from gender-based violence, enhancing the effectiveness of responses to it. Using statistical data on the prevalence of domestic violence, comparisons with the international standard on domestic violence and the legislative practices of other states in criminalising domestic violence, the study examines what changes Kazakhstan needs to make to its criminal law in order for it to effectively combat domestic violence. The results show that the criminal law should distinguish between violence committed by strangers and violence committed by loved ones, introduce new offences: forced marriage (cohabitation), pushing, prohibit repeated mediation in domestic violence cases, and extend criminal liability for sexual harassment to all victims, not just those under 16 years of age.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarykulov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebeb185a1ff6a93015ff9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The impact of intimate partner violence on preschool children's peer problems: An analysis of risk and protective factors2015 · 60 citations
  2. 2Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Victims With Police and the Justice System in Canada2018 · 61 citations
  3. 3Mainstreaming Domestic and Gender-Based Violence into Sociology and the Criminology of Violence2014 · 123 citations
  4. 4Thinking against humanity2017 · 36 citations
  5. 5Intimate Violence Against Women: Trajectories for Pastoral Care in a New Millennium2011 · 21 citations