PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026Marine Pollution Bulletin0 citationsOpen Access

Radiological risk assessment of natural radionuclides in the whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri Desmarest, 1823) in Brazilian tropical seas

View Full Paper
WPWagner de Souza PereiraAKAlphonse KelecomJLJosé M. Lopes

Key Points

  • The goal is to evaluate the radiological risk to the whitemouth croaker from natural radionuclides in Brazilian seas.
  • Samples of whitemouth croaker were collected from Sepetiba Bay.
  • Radiological measurements for various radionuclides were conducted.
  • Activity concentrations were expressed in Bq·kg^-1.
  • Derived Consideration Reference Levels were used for assessing potential deleterious effects.
  • The average dose rate in M. furnieri was 7.72 μGy∙d^-1.
  • This dose rate falls within the background range, indicating no visible biological effects.
  • Study highlights the need for more radiological risk assessments in tropical marine environments.

Abstract

This study assesses the radiological risk to the whitemouth croaker (Micropogonias furnieri Desmarest, 1823) by calculating the dose to biota. Samples were collected, identified, and prepared for analysis from Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The activity concentration (AC) results of 238U, 235U, 234U, 232Th, 230Th, 228Th, 228Ra, 226Ra, and 210Pb are expressed in Bq·kg-1. The study highlighted that biota radioprotection does not recommend dose limit concepts due to model boundary conditions, focusing instead on Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRL), which are used to screen for potential deleterious effects of ionizing radiation. The radionuclide-specific Dose Coefficient (DoCo) values for the analyzed radionuclides in saltwater fish are presented. The average dose rate found in M. furnieri was 7.72-2 μGy∙d-1. This average dose rate falls within the background range, suggesting no visible biological effects. The research emphasizes the need for radiological risk assessments in tropical regions, which are often underexplored compared to temperate regions. The study calls for broader studies using representative organisms to inform national legislation aimed at protecting biota from radiological risks, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of environmental safety and health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebeb185a1ff6a9301602bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper