PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Modeling residential building heating and cooling loads with interpretable symbolic regression

View Full Paper
ZÖZeynep ÖztürkMCMehmet Cengiz

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop interpretable models for predicting heating and cooling loads in residential buildings.
  • Applied symbolic regression algorithms to the Energy Efficiency Dataset.
  • Predicted heating load (HL) and cooling load (CL) based on architectural features.
  • Compared symbolic regression with traditional methods like Linear Regression and Random Forest.
  • Achieved RMSE values of 1.16 for HL and 2.35 for CL.
  • R² values were 0.987 for HL and 0.941 for CL, indicating high accuracy.
  • Identified compactness, surface area, and glazing characteristics as key factors influencing thermal demands.

Abstract

Improving the energy performance of residential buildings requires models that are not only accurate but also transparent and interpretable. This study applies multiple state-of-the-art Symbolic Regression (SR) algorithms to the well-known Energy Efficiency Dataset to predict Heating Load (HL) and Cooling Load (CL) based on architectural features. Unlike previous studies that rely heavily on black-box machine learning methods, this work generates explicit, human-readable analytical expressions that reveal the underlying relationships between building parameters and thermal demands. The proposed SR models achieve competitive accuracy, with RMSE values of 1.16 (HL) and 2.35 (CL), and R² values of 0.987 and 0.941, respectively. In addition to strong quantitative performance, the symbolic expressions provide qualitative insights into feature importance, such as the dominant role of compactness, surface area, and glazing characteristics. The novelty of this study lies in offering the first comprehensive symbolic regression framework for this dataset, presenting interpretable analytical equations that preserve physical meaning, and comparing SR directly with Linear Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting to demonstrate that interpretability can be achieved without compromising predictive accuracy. These results highlight the potential of symbolic modelling as a transparent and reliable tool for energy-efficient building design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebeb185a1ff6a93016031https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109080
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Order of Nonlinearity as a Complexity Measure for Models Generated by Symbolic Regression via Pareto Genetic Programming2008 · 362 citations
  2. 2Assessing the impact of climate change on building heating and cooling energy demand in Canada2019 · 352 citations
  3. 3Energy prediction techniques for large-scale buildings towards a sustainable built environment: A review2020 · 156 citations
  4. 4A review of “Symbolic Regression” by Gabriel Kronberger, Bogdan Burlacu, Michael Kommenda, Stephan M. Winkler, and Michael Affenzeller, ISBN 978-1-138-05481-3, 2024, CRC Press.2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5A gray-box model for unitary air conditioners developed with symbolic regression2024 · 22 citations