PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026Postgraduate Medical Journal0 citations

Economic and environmental impact of reducing unnecessary coagulation screen testing on an acute medical unit: a quality improvement project

View Full Paper
MNMagda NasherNBNatalie E. R. BeveridgeSBStacy Burrows

Key Points

  • This project aimed to decrease unnecessary coagulation testing by 90% to enhance efficiency and align with sustainability goals.
  • Conducted baseline audits to identify inappropriate coagulation tests.
  • Implemented Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test interventions.
  • Used digital decision prompts and revised electronic order sets to guide clinicians.
  • Inappropriate testing reduced from 34%-39% to 20% in mSDEC, 10% in AMU 1B, and 15% in AMU 1C post-intervention.
  • Projected avoidance of 44,000 tests annually, resulting in £130,000 savings.
  • Reduced staff workload by 367 hours and decreased carbon emissions by 3.6 tonnes CO₂e.

Abstract

Abstract Background Inappropriate coagulation testing contributes to inefficiency, cost, and environmental harm. Baseline audits on our acute medical unit (AMU) showed that one-third of coagulation screen requests lacked a clear clinical indication. Aim To reduce unnecessary coagulation screens on acute medical services AMU and Medical Same Day Emergency Care (mSDEC) by 90% within 12 months, aligned with National Health Service (NHS) Net Zero ambitions and our Trust’s Green Plan. Methods Using the Model for Improvement, we conducted three Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles. Our analogue and digital interventions included revised triage order sets, condition-specific electronic order sets, and a digital decision prompt requiring clinicians to confirm test indication. Data were collected at baseline (January–February 2024) and re-audited after interventions (December 2024). Outcome measures were the proportion of inappropriate tests, cost savings, staff time, and carbon reduction. Results At baseline, 34%–39% of coagulation screens were inappropriate across AMU areas. Postintervention, inappropriate testing reduced to 20% in mSDEC, 10% in AMU 1B, and 15% in AMU 1C. This equates to a projected annual reduction of 44 000 tests, saving £130 000, 367 staff hours, and 3.6 tonnes CO₂e (equivalent to a 9000-mile car journey). Laboratory workload and plastic waste also fell substantially. Conclusion Embedding decision prompts within electronic order systems achieved rapid, sustained reductions in unnecessary testing. This scalable, low-cost intervention aligns clinical practice with sustainability goals and offers a model for reducing unwarranted diagnostics across the NHS. In the face of the climate crisis, aligning practice with environmental goals is both a professional responsibility and an opportunity to improve care, efficiency, and outcomes. Key messages What is already known on this topic Inappropriate coagulation testing is common across NHS acute care, with studies showing over one-third of tests lack a clinical indication.Excess diagnostic testing contributes to financial costs, staff workload, plastic waste, and carbon emissions.Previous quality improvement initiatives have focused mainly on education or guideline dissemination, with variable success. What this study adds Embedding a simple digital decision prompt into electronic order sets significantly reduced inappropriate coagulation screens across an Acute Medical Unit.The intervention was low-cost, rapidly implemented, and co-designed with frontline clinicians to improve uptake and sustainability.Projected impact includes avoidance of 44 000 tests annually, saving ~£130 000, 367 staff hours, and 3.6 tonnes CO₂e, supporting NHS Net Zero targets.This scalable model demonstrates how small digital changes can drive large improvements in clinical quality, efficiency, and sustainability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nasher et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebf3485a1ff6a930166e9https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgag014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recognizing the Potential for Overdiagnosis: Are High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays an Example?2019 · 33 citations
  2. 2Saving the NHS one blood test at a time2014 · 18 citations
  3. 3Reducing the number of unnecessary laboratory tests within hospital through the use of educational interventions2021 · 10 citations
  4. 4The carbon footprint of pathology testing2020 · 190 citations
  5. 5The Lancet Commission on pollution and health2017 · 4,935 citations