PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2026BJUI Compass0 citationsOpen Access

Oncological outcomes post focal low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy in low‐intermediate risk prostate cancer

View Full Paper
MAMohammadmehdi AdhamiJCJeremy ChengEAElliot Anderson

Key Points

  • To evaluate oncological control and pathological progression after focal low-dose-rate brachytherapy in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.
  • Prospective, multi-centre clinical registry
  • Inclusion criteria focused on unifocal ISUP GG1, GG2, and GG3 prostate cancers
  • Follow-up involved serial PSA measurements and repeat biopsies at 18-24 months
  • Pathological control achieved in 76.4% of patients
  • 25 patients had negative biopsies, with 12 showing clinically insignificant disease
  • Salvage treatment necessary for 9.1% of patients
  • Mean PSA velocity >0.55 ng/mL/year predicted pathological progression with high sensitivity and specificity

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To prospectively evaluate oncological control, pathological progression, and its predictors following focal low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy for low‐intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods LIBERATE is a prospective, multi‐centre clinical registry of patients who have undergone focal LDR brachytherapy for low‐intermediate risk PCa since September 2019 (ACTRN:12619001669189). Unifocal ISUP GG1 (≥10 mm in ≥1 core), GG2 (any length) or GG3 (longest core0.55 ng/mL/year was a strong predictor of pathological progression (OR 23.54, 95% CI 4.28–129.35, p = 0.001), with a sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 90.5%. Conclusion With a median follow‐up of 38 months, these early results suggest that focal LDR brachytherapy for low‐intermediate risk, single‐lesion, imaging‐visible PCa demonstrates satisfactory oncological control. However, further follow‐up is needed to assess long‐term oncological outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adhami et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698ebf5085a1ff6a93016b1fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper