PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Immediate effects of dynamic and Kinesio taping on balance and ground reaction forces in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome

View Full Paper
AYAli YalfaniSRShirin RasouliMAMasoud Azizian

Key Points

  • This research compares the effects of dynamic taping and kinesio taping on balance and ground reaction forces in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
  • Single-blind randomized crossover trial
  • 39 young women aged 20-30 with patellofemoral pain syndrome
  • Three groups: dynamic taping, kinesio taping, and control without tape
  • Y-Balance Test for dynamic balance assessment
  • Measurement of vertical ground reaction forces during walking
  • Dynamic taping improved dynamic balance and vertical ground reaction forces compared to kinesio taping.
  • Significant improvement in dynamic balance metrics (p < 0.05) and ground reaction forces (p < 0.05) with dynamic taping.
  • Dynamic taping showed greater effectiveness in enhancing balance and reducing contact time than kinesio taping.

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) can impair dynamic balance and vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF). Dynamic Taping (DT) and Kinesio Taping (KT) were recently used to rehabilitate musculoskeletal injuries. This study aimed to compare the effects of Dynamic Taping and Kinesio Taping on the dynamic balance and vertical ground reaction forces during gait in women with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. This study was a three-arm and a single-blind randomized crossover trial. Participants were 39 young women aged 20–30, with Patellofemoral pain syndrome who were randomly divided into three groups: dynamic taping group, Kinesio taping group, and control without tape (WT) group. The rehabilitation protocol, along with the assessment, was carried out across three separate sessions on different days. Dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-Balance Test, and vertical ground reaction forces were measured during self-selected walking by the participants. The study results indicated that dynamic taping and kinesio taping improved dynamic balance (Anterior p = 0.002,η 2 = 0.244, Posterior-lateral p < 0.001,η 2 = 0.470, and Posterior-Medial p = 0.002,η 2 = 0.284) and vertical ground reaction forces (GRF-Max1 p = 0.007,η 2 = 0.233, GRF-Max2 p = 0.001,η 2 = 0.323, and Contact Time p < 0.001,η 2 = 0.345). Also, dynamic taping was more effective than kinesio taping in variables of dynamic balance in Anterior ( p = 0.042), Posterior-Medial ( p = 0.032), Posterior-lateral ( p = 0.032), and the vertical ground reaction forces in the GRF-Max1 ( p = 0.033), GRF-Max2 ( p = 0.002), and Contact Time ( p = 0.045). Considering that the improvement in dynamic balance in Anterior, Posterior-Medial, Posterior-lateral, and the vertical ground reaction forces in the GRF-Max1, GRF-Max2, and Contact Time was greater in the dynamic taping group compared to kinesio taping, dynamic taping can be considered as a complementary program to rehabilitation protocols for Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Trial registration: IRCTID, IRCT20200204046368N10 (03/06/2023). Registered 1 June 2023.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yalfani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698fd276306598e8538de99ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39856-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper