PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026European Journal of Applied Physiology0 citationsOpen Access

Physiological and perceptual effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons during repetitive lifting in healthy adults

View Full Paper
JVJohannes VoßJDJonas DeickeULULRICH LAUFS

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the physiological and perceptual impacts of passive back-support exoskeletons during lifting tasks.
  • Twenty-six healthy adults participated in a controlled lifting task
  • Three conditions were tested: without exoskeleton (FREE), with rigid PBE (RIGID), and with soft PBE (SOFT)
  • Cardiac load, energy expenditure, and neuromuscular activity were measured using advanced physiological assessments
  • Perceived exertion and comfort ratings were collected before, during, and after the task
  • Both PBEs significantly reduced rate-pressure product and energy expenditure during lifting
  • RIGID exoskeleton notably decreased gluteus maximus activation
  • Post-task comfort ratings declined for both exoskeleton devices
  • No significant differences between the two types of exoskeletons across all measured parameters

Abstract

Passive back-support exoskeletons (PBEs) are wearable devices designed to reduce strain during physical labor, e.g., repetitive lifting. This study investigated acute effects of two PBEs on cardiac load, energy expenditure, neuromuscular activity, and perceived exertion during repetitive lifting. Twenty-six healthy adults performed a standardized lifting task under three conditions: without exoskeleton (FREE), with a rigid PBE (RIGID), and with a soft PBE (SOFT). Cardiac load was assessed via impedance cardiography and blood pressure; energy expenditure via respiratory gas analysis; and neuromuscular activity via surface electromyography. Subjective ratings of exertion and comfort were collected before, during, and after the task. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analyses of variances and mixed-effects models, all followed by post-hoc tests. Both exoskeletons reduced rate-pressure product (RIGID: −8.1%, p = 0.001; SOFT: −6.5%, p = 0.003), energy expenditure (RIGID: −13.9%, p < 0.0001; SOFT: −9.4%, p < 0.0001), and perceived exertion (RIGID: −14.4%, p < 0.001; SOFT: −9.5%, p = 0.034) compared to FREE. Only RIGID reduced gluteus maximus muscle activation (− 21%, p = 0.005). No significant changes were observed in trunk or abdominal muscles. Wearing comfort declined post-task for both devices. No differences occurred between PBEs across all parameters. This study demonstrates that rigid and soft PBEs consistently reduce physiological and perceptual demands during lifting. By integrating central and peripheral hemodynamic measures, we extend understanding of cardiac unloading. Long-term field studies are needed to assess whether these benefits persist in real-world settings and contribute to musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Voß et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698fd276306598e8538dea44https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06125-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effects of Passive and Active Back Support Exoskeletons on Endurance, Perceived Exertion, and Back Discomfort During Fatigue-Induced Repetitive Lifting2025
  2. 2Comparing the Effects of User Preference and Experience When Using Passive Low Back Exoskeletons on Physical and Cognitive Load While Performing Simulated Manufacturing Tasks2025
  3. 3Age and gender differences in the perception and use of soft vs. rigid exoskeletons for manual material handling2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Biomechanical effects of soft and rigid passive back occupational exoskeletons during load-carrying and static trunk bending tasks in the aeronautics industry2025
  5. 5Evaluation of the subjective and objective benefits of occupational soft and rigid back support exoskeletons in simulated automotive assembly tasks2026