PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026International Journal of Applied Glass Science0 citationsOpen Access

Thermomechanical and Interfacial Properties of Lead‐Free Bi 2 O 3 −ZnO−B 2 O 3 Glasses for Hermetic Sealing Applications

View Full Paper
ZQZeyu QinSLShuang LiuBGBotao Guan

Key Points

  • This work aims to evaluate the thermomechanical and interfacial properties of lead-free bismuthate glasses for their suitability in hermetic sealing applications.
  • Modified bismuthate glasses through BaO for B2O3 and SrO for BaO substitutions.
  • Measured glass transition temperature and thermal expansion coefficient.
  • Analyzed mechanical properties such as nanohardness and elastic modulus.
  • Conducted Raman spectral analysis to assess structural changes.
  • Tested compatibility with 304 stainless steel for hermetic sealing.
  • BaO substitution lowered glass transition temperature and enhanced thermal expansion but reduced mechanical strength.
  • SrO exchange maintained density and mechanical properties while supporting a broader sealing temperature range.
  • Both glass systems achieved thermal expansion compatibility with stainless steel, validating their application for hermetic sealing.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lead‐free bismuthate‐based sealing glasses are of growing interest for environmentally sustainable electronic and packaging applications. In this work, lead‐free Bi 2 O 3 –ZnO–B 2 O 3 glasses were modified through two distinct substitution routes—BaO replacing B 2 O 3 and SrO exchanging for BaO—to evaluate their suitability for glass‐to‐metal sealing. BaO‐for‐B 2 O 3 substitution reduced glass transition temperature (330→325°C) and increased coefficient of thermal expansion (13.0→14.1 ppm/K) due to network depolymerization, yielding a low sealing range of 505–550°C, but decreasing nanohardness (4.9→4.6 GPa) and elastic modulus (69→63 GPa). SrO‐for‐BaO exchange maintained nearly constant density and mechanical properties, with only minor fluctuations in thermomechanical properties, while supporting a sealing window of 520–580°C. Raman spectra confirmed increasing nonbridging oxygen formation in BaO‐substituted glasses, whereas SrO exchange induced only subtle structural shifts. Both systems formed diffusion‐bonded interfacial layers (<2 µm) with 304 stainless steel and showed thermal expansion compatibility (mismatch <10%), validating hermetic sealing. These results establish BaO‐for‐B 2 O 3 substitution as advantageous for low‐temperature sealing and SrO‐for‐BaO exchange as beneficial for stabilizing thermomechanical properties, offering complementary design strategies for sustainable lead‐free sealing glasses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699010ce2ccff479cfe5706ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.70026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper