PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Remote Sensing0 citationsOpen Access

Application of the Thermo-RAdiometric Normalization of Crop Observations (TRANCO) Back in Time: An Assessment of the Potential for Crop Time-Series Generalization to Past Years Using Wheat as a Proxy

JCJuanma CintasEGEmilio GuiradoJMJaime Martínez-Valderrama

Key Points

  • The main aim is to improve the generalization of crop type maps across years by normalizing wheat crop time-series data.
  • Normalized annual wheat time-series using Growing Degree Days (GDDs) and crop calendars.
  • Built yearly time series from Crop Data Layer (CDL) and Landsat imagery for 2008–2020.
  • Tested two normalization approaches: TRANCO using GDDs and Time Windows using crop calendars.
  • Evaluated model performance using Jeffries–Matusita distances and random forest classifiers.
  • TRANCO normalization achieved the best average behavior (JM = 0.3).
  • TRANCO classifier resulted in the highest F1 score (F1 = 0.779).
  • Both Time Windows and Baseline models had lower F1 scores (0.71 and 0.73, respectively).
  • TRANCO demonstrated greater stability in classifier performance over the validation period.

Abstract

Crop type maps are essential for food security. However, there is a gap in information for worldwide maps that, at the same time, cover a wide period of time. The inability of classification algorithms to generalize information across years is one of the main reasons for this lack of information. This study aims to advance this direction by normalizing annual time series of wheat crops using the accumulation of Growing Degree Days (GDDs). Based on the Crop Data Layer (CDL) crop-type maps and Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery, we built yearly time series for the period 2008–2020. Then, we tested the performance of two normalization approaches: TRANCO, which uses Growing Degree Days (GDDs) and Crop Calendars to normalize time-series data; and Time Windows, which uses Crop Calendars to define wheat’s biofix dates and normalize time-series data. Furthermore, we compared them with a Baseline, meaning a time series without further processing. Such performance was tested in two main ways: By computing the Jeffries–Matusita (JM) distances between time series and their average behavior, and by training random forest classifiers. For the latter, we defined a training period (2017–2020) during which we trained the models, and a validation period (2008–2016), during which we validated them on years the models were not trained on. We found that TRANCO was the best normalization approach for bringing the time-series closer to a common behavior (JM = 0.3), compared to Time windows (JM = 0.4) or the Baseline. Also, it achieved the best classification results (F1 = 0.779), compared to Time windows (F1 = 0.71) or the Baseline (F1 = 0.73), and, in addition, TRANCO’s classifier was the most stable throughout the validation period, empowering past crop type classifications with classifiers trained in recent years.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cintas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699010f22ccff479cfe57468https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040571
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper