PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Biochar5 citationsOpen Access

Fourteen-year field evidence reveals superior co-benefits of biochar in immobilizing heavy metals and sequestering carbon

MMMengmeng MaYZYunqian ZhangQMQiwen Ma

Key Points

  • This research investigates the long-term effects of biochar on heavy metal bioavailability and speciation in agricultural soils.
  • Conducted a 14-year field trial with high-dosage biochar, low-dosage biochar, and straw amendments.
  • Measured the bioavailability and speciation of heavy metals in soil samples.
  • Employed partial least squares-structural equation modeling to analyze data on microbial and physicochemical properties.
  • High-dosage biochar reduced heavy metal bioavailability by 2–91%, outperforming low-dosage biochar and straw.
  • The biochar driven transformation significantly influenced metal speciation and was linked to increased soil organic carbon.
  • The coupling index revealed high-dosage biochar is more effective in synergistically immobilizing metals and sequestering carbon.

Abstract

Abstract Heavy metal contamination in global agricultural soils has posed severe ecological and health risks. However, little is known about the long-term effects of soil management on the bioavailable concentration and the speciation of heavy metals, especially via physicochemical and microbial processes. Utilizing a 14-year field trial, we showed that high-dosage biochar (HBC) effectively reduced heavy metal bioavailability by 2–91%, outperforming low-dosage biochar (LBC) and straw amendments. Both HBC and LBC drove residual Cd, Zn, and Pb toward reducible fractions, whereas straw exhibited no significant impact. Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and variance partitioning analysis indicated that the concentration and speciation of metals were co-regulated by physicochemical and microbial properties, with microbial attributes dominating bioavailability (30% variance) and physicochemical governing speciation (12%). Specifically, biochar reduced bioavailability by increasing the cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and free iron oxides, coupled with enriching Entomophthoromycota and Nitrospirae while suppressing Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia. Conversely, straw increased bioavailability by decreasing CEC but enhancing enzyme activity alongside Bacteroidetes or Verrucomicrobia. For metal speciation, biochar drove the transformation of speciation by enhancing SOC, aromatic compound levels, and Zoopagomycota, but suppressing Ascomycota and Latescibacteria. By evaluating the coupling index of heavy metal immobilization and carbon sequestration, we showed that HBC had a higher score (0.703) than LBC (0.361) and straw (0.396). This indicated that HBC can more effectively immobilize heavy metals than LBC and straw, and achieve extra benefits in promoting carbon sequestration. Our results provided insights into adjusting soil management practices to achieve soil multi ecosystem functions and improve agricultural sustainability. Highlights Coupling index shows HBC can synergistically immobilize heavy metal and sequester C. HBC reduced heavy metal bioavailability and drove residual toward reducible fractions. Heavy metal bioavailability was dominated by Entomophthoromycota and Bacteroidetes. Heavy metal speciation was governed by SOC content and aromaticity. Graphical Abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6990113f2ccff479cfe57cc5https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-025-00553-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper