PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026The American Journal of Gastroenterology0 citations

Antibiotic Use Linked to Worse Outcomes in Gastrointestinal and Liver Cancer Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
MRMohammad Saeid Rezaee-ZavarehHKHamidreza Karimi-SariCPChulwoo Park

Key Points

  • This research evaluates how antibiotic use impacts clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal and liver cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of studies involving patients with gastrointestinal or liver cancers on immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Compared clinical outcomes between antibiotic users and non-users focusing on overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease control rate.
  • Used random-effects models for pooled analyses, assessing hazard and odds ratios based on the data from eligible studies.
  • Antibiotic use linked to worse overall survival (HR 1.56) and progression-free survival (HR 1.48).
  • Disease control rate was also negatively impacted (OR 0.55).
  • Do not find a significant difference in objective response rate (OR 1.01).
  • Subgroup analyses reveal specific cancers like hepatocellular carcinoma and upper gastrointestinal cancers show negative outcomes, while colorectal cancer saw improved overall survival.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in gastrointestinal and liver cancers. However, antibiotic-induced gut microbiota disruption may influence ICI effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes among patients with gastrointestinal and liver cancers receiving ICI therapy. Methods: In this meta-analysis, we searched studies involving adults with gastrointestinal or liver cancers treated with ICIs, comparing outcomes between patients with and without antibiotic use. Eligible studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR). Random-effects models were used for pooled analyses. Results: 28 studies were included. Antibiotic use was associated with worse OS (HR 1.56; 95%CI: 1.23–1.98; I 2 =87.3%), PFS (HR 1.48; 95%CI: 1.15–1.90; I 2 =88.3%), and DCR (OR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33–0.90, I 2 =65.0%), but no significant difference in ORR (OR 1.01; 95%CI: 0.78–1.31; I 2 =0%). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses by ICI type and timing of antibiotic administration. Antibiotic use was associated with worse OS and PFS in hepatocellular carcinoma (HR for OS: 1.49; 95%CI: 1.24–1.79; HR for PFS: 1.25; 95%CI: 1.01–1.56) and upper gastrointestinal cancers (HR for OS: 2.40; 95%CI: 1.48–3.90; HR for PFS: 2.15; 95%CI: 1.18–3.91), whereas colorectal cancer studies showed improved OS (HR: 0.58; 95%CI: 0.45–0.75). Conclusion: Antibiotic use is associated with worse outcomes in gastrointestinal or liver cancer patients receiving ICIs and should be carefully justified. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rezaee-Zavareh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011522ccff479cfe57e56https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003956
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper