ABSTRACT When using flexible work arrangements for caregiving, fathers risk deviating from both social expectations of breadwinning and ideal worker standards, yet implications of this divergence across different occupational classes remain unclear. Using 40 semi‐structured interviews with fathers from the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK, this study explores and compares the negotiated use of flexible working arrangements (FWAs) for care among managerial‐professional fathers and fathers in routine white‐collar and blue‐collar occupations. Employing abductive analysis within a constructivist grounded theory framework, the article delves into how fathers from different work‐related backgrounds navigate the tension between their paid work (in)flexibility and their childcare involvement. Results show evidence of occupational‐class differences in two key areas: Varying degrees of access to and use of FWAs for care; and navigating work and family dedication, including how fathers deal with competing commitments and what using flexibility implies for the tension between expectations of being both involved fathers and dedicated workers. At a higher level of abstraction, these contribute to theorization of a class‐based double bind of fatherhood and flexibility, providing a much‐needed view of how working fathers navigate the complexities of (gendered) organizational structures. Finally, implications are discussed, including organizational support addressing occupational‐class barriers to FWAs.
Carla Brega (2026) studied this question.