PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Critical Discursive Psychology and the Society of the Spectacle: A Debordian Approach to Digital Technologies

View Full Paper
ARAnastasia Rousaki

Key Points

  • The aim is to merge Critical Discursive Psychology with Debord's theories to critique digital technologies' discursive practices.
  • Analyzed discourses surrounding digital technologies using a Debord-influenced Critical Discursive Psychology
  • Examined language's role in constructing identities and subjectivities
  • Integrated discursive micro-analysis with macro-critical perspectives
  • Identified how discourses of self-care and agency perpetuate neoliberal ideals
  • Highlighted the obscured structural inequalities behind technological development
  • Demonstrated how language and technology intersect in contemporary culture

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a critical framework that merges Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP) with Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle to explicate the discourses surrounding digital technologies. Although CDP offers an analytic lens for examining how language constructs subjectivities, identities and ideological frameworks, it has yet to fully address the logics of commodification that characterise digital capitalism, where technologies are discursively framed, commodified and consumed as images of empowerment, productivity and well‐being. Drawing on Debord's critique of mediated social relations, this paper proposes a Debord‐influenced CDP that situates discursive practices within broader economies of visibility and performance. Through this synthesis, I argue that discourses of self‐care, digital innovation, agency and autonomy function both to legitimise neoliberal ideals and to obscure structural inequalities underpinning technological development. The paper highlights how this combined framework can be employed to analyse and reveal the ideological dilemmas, subject positions and interpretative repertoires that reinforce the spectacle of digital technologies and, in doing so, it can challenge psychology's complicity in reproducing these logics. Through the integration of discursive micro‐analysis with Debord's macro‐critical lens, this approach advances a politically attuned methodology for examining the intersection of language, technology and power in contemporary digital culture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anastasia Rousaki (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011712ccff479cfe581b0https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70234
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Digitalization of Social Care in England and Implications for Older, Unpaid Carers: Constructionist Thematic Analysis2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Discursive Psychology2014 · 15 citations
  3. 3Friendship Work on Facebook: Young Adults' Understandings and Practices of Friendship2014 · 31 citations
  4. 4On Digital Reproductive Labor and the “Mother Commodity”2022 · 3 citations
  5. 5Images of the “future of work”. A discourse analysis of visual data on the internet2023 · 9 citations