PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A procedure for writing multi-author consensus manuscripts: Implementation and reflections on conflict resolution and generalizations Author Accepted Manuscript

View Full Paper
AKAttila KrajcsiKCKrzysztof CiporaDCDana L. Chesney

Key Points

  • The main aim is to outline a procedure for writing multi-author consensus manuscripts and reflect on the implementation of this process.
  • Developed a procedure for writing consensus papers
  • Implemented collaborative authorship practices
  • Reflected on conflict resolution strategies
  • The procedure fosters agreement on terminology and constructs
  • Streamlined authorship encouraged better collaborative outcomes
  • Insights gained can help other authors in similar projects

Abstract

A domain/field of research can often benefit from a consensus. Agreement regarding terminology and tasks used to measure specific constructs may be particularly beneficial. Our group authored such a consensus paper on measuring the Approximate Number System in young children (Krajcsi et al., 2024). In preparing that paper, we followed the procedure described here. In the current paper, we describe a method for preparing multi-author consensus papers along with our reflections on implementing and streamlining this procedure. We hope it is useful to authors interested in initiating such collaborative projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krajcsi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011812ccff479cfe583c6https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper