PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Proper units for pro-environmental behavior: a review and feasibility study of private-sphere behaviors Author Accepted Manuscript

View Full Paper
IAIrene AlfaroneMGMatthias Gondan

Key Points

  • To examine how pro-environmental behavior can be measured and linked to environmental impact through a common metric.
  • Reviewed articles on pro-environmental behavior published in 2023 in the Journal of Environmental Psychology.
  • Analyzed various measurement methods of private-sphere pro-environmental behavior.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis to estimate potential CO2 savings linked to these behaviors.
  • Identified high variability in measurements of pro-environmental behavior.
  • Noted that most behaviors assessed had low environmental impact.
  • Suggested closer connections between behavior assessments and measurable environmental outcomes.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions caused by private-sphere behaviors are an important contributor to global warming. Therefore, one major focus of environmental psychology is on Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB). Despite the importance of the topic, there is low consensus on how PEB should be measured. The present study explores whether self-reported measures of private-sphere PEB can be feasibly translated into a common metric of environmental impact (tCO2-eq). To this end, we reviewed a sample of articles published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology in 2023, analyzed how PEB was measured and assessed its impact in terms of carbon dioxide emissions. We then conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the potential CO2 savings associated with these measures. The analyses reveal high heterogeneity in PEB measurement, with a dominating role of low-impact behaviors. The results suggest that a stronger link between behavioral assessment and its measurable environmental consequences could make PEB research more rigorous, transparent and relevant for interdisciplinary collaboration and climate policy development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alfarone et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011812ccff479cfe5849chttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper