PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026JCO oncology advances.4 citationsOpen Access

Three-Year Update of a Randomized Phase IIb Study of the Individualized Neoantigen Therapy Intismeran Autogene (mRNA-4157, V940) Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab in Resected Melanoma

View Full Paper
MCMatteo S. CarlinoAKAdnan KhattakTMTarek Meniawy

Key Points

  • To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab in high-risk resected melanoma.
  • Phase IIb randomized study
  • Patients with completely resected high-risk cutaneous melanoma
  • Compared intismeran plus pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone
  • Primary endpoint: recurrence-free survival (RFS)
  • Secondary endpoints: distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety
  • Median follow-up of 3 years showed improved RFS (HR 0.510) and DMFS (HR 0.384) compared to pembrolizumab alone
  • Adverse events were low-grade, with serious AEs and grade 3/4 events comparable between groups
  • No grade 4/5 events related to intismeran observed

Abstract

PURPOSE Primary analysis of KEYNOTE-942 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897881 ) demonstrated prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for the individualized neoantigen therapy intismeran autogene (intismeran; formerly mRNA-4157 or V940) with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone in high-risk resected melanoma. This update provides an additional year of follow-up to assess longer-term efficacy/safety. METHODS KEYNOTE-942 is a phase IIb study in patients with completely resected high-risk (stage IIIB to IV) cutaneous melanoma who were randomly assigned to receive either intismeran plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone. The primary end point was RFS; secondary end points included DMFS and safety/tolerability. Overall survival and biomarker data were exploratory. RESULTS With a median follow-up of approximately 3 years, and a minimum of approximately 2 years (median range 34.9 25.1-51.0 months), the combination continued to demonstrate improvement in RFS (hazard ratio HR, 0.510 80% CI, 0.351 to 0.743) and DMFS (HR, 0.384 80% CI, 0.227 to 0.650) compared with pembrolizumab. The safety profile was consistent with earlier findings. Most adverse events (AEs) were low-grade, with serious AEs, immune-related AEs, and grade 3/4 events comparable between the arms and no grade 4/5 events related to intismeran. CONCLUSION Intismeran plus pembrolizumab significantly prolongs RFS and DMFS compared with pembrolizumab alone for the adjuvant treatment of resected high-risk melanoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carlino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011932ccff479cfe584d9https://doi.org/10.1200/oa-25-00008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper