PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Psychophysiology0 citationsOpen Access

No Effect of Continuous Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on the P3 , the P600 , or Physiological Markers of Noradrenergic Activity in an Oddball and Sentence Comprehension Task

View Full Paper
FCFriederike ContierIWIsabell WartenburgerMWMathias Weymar

Key Points

  • To investigate the effects of continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on P3 and P600 ERP components while also assessing their relationship with noradrenergic activity.
  • Conducted an experiment with forty participants on two tasks: a visual oddball and a sentence processing task.
  • Applied continuous taVNS during one session and sham stimulation during another session.
  • Measured P3 and P600 amplitudes and physiological noradrenergic markers, including salivary alpha-amylase and pupil size.
  • P3 and P600 effects were robust; however, taVNS did not influence their amplitudes.
  • Noradrenergic markers, salivary alpha-amylase and pupil size, remained unchanged under taVNS.
  • Exploratory analyses showed correlations between the P600, P3, and salivary alpha-amylase levels, suggesting a possible relationship.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ERP components P3 and P600 have been proposed to reflect phasic activity of the locus coeruleus norepinephrine (LC/NE) system in response to deviant and task‐relevant stimuli across cognitive domains. However, causal evidence for this link remains limited. Here, we used continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a noninvasive method proposed to modulate LC/NE activity, to test whether these components are indeed sensitive to NE manipulation. Forty participants completed both an active visual oddball task and a sentence processing task, including both syntactic and semantic violations, while receiving continuous taVNS at the cymba conchae in one session and sham stimulation at the earlobe in another session. We observed robust P3 and P600 effects. Crucially, however, taVNS had no effect on P3 or P600 amplitude. The physiological NE markers, salivary alpha‐amylase level and baseline pupil size, were also unaffected by the stimulation, suggesting that the taVNS protocol and/or task may not have been sufficient to successfully engage the LC/NE system. Beyond the stimulation, however, exploratory analyses revealed correlations between the syntactic P600 and both the P3 and salivary alpha‐amylase levels, supporting the idea that the P600 might be related to both the P3 and NE. Overall, our findings do not allow for theoretical implications concerning a potential causal link between the two components and NE but highlight the need for more standardized taVNS protocols.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Contier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011932ccff479cfe5857ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1No effect of continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on the P3 and the P600 in an oddball and sentence comprehension task2025
  2. 2No evidence for a modulating effect of continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on markers of noradrenergic activity2022 · 43 citations
  3. 3Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on the P300: Do Stimulation Duration and Stimulation Type Matter?2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Continuous Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Increases Long‐Latency Neural Processing in Multiple Sensory Modalities2025 · 7 citations
  5. 5Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on associative memory and event-related potential P300: a single-blind experiment on healthy adults2025