PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation

View Full Paper
PHP. Montero de HijesKSKaihang ShiCVCarlos Vega

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare mechanical and thermodynamic definitions of pressure during ice nucleation and assess their interfacial properties.
  • Used hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models for crystal nucleation studies.
  • Calculated mechanical pressure in an ice nucleus within supercooled water at 1 bar and 247 K.
  • Extracted interfacial stress from mechanical pressure and compared it with thermodynamic pressure and interfacial free energy.
  • Investigated properties on the basal plane of the ice nucleus.
  • Mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the ice nucleus, unlike previous models.
  • Interfacial stress is comparable to interfacial free energy for the ice nucleus.
  • Basal interface exhibits interfacial stress nearly double its interfacial free energy, signaling possible system dependency.

Abstract

Crystal nucleation studies using hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models have shown that the actual (mechanical) pressure within the nucleus is lower than that in the surrounding liquid. Here, we use the mechanical route to obtain the pressure for an ice nucleus in supercooled water (TIP4P/Ice) at 1 bar and 247 K. From this pressure, we obtain the interfacial stress using a thermodynamic definition consistent with mechanical arguments. Moreover, we compare the mechanical pressure with the thermodynamic pressure of bulk ice at an equal chemical potential and the interfacial stress with the interfacial free energy. Furthermore, we investigate these properties on the basal plane. We find that unlike in hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the nucleus, and the interfacial stress and free energy are comparable. However, the basal interface displays an interfacial stress nearly twice its interfacial free energy, suggesting that this agreement may be dependent on the system, underscoring the limitations of mechanical routes to solid-liquid interfacial free energies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hijes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011a12ccff479cfe586ddhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03700
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper