PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026European Heart Journal - Digital Health3 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence-enhanced ECG score for perioperative risk assessment in non-cardiac surgery

View Full Paper
HCHong-Mi ChoiYKYerin KimJKJoonghee Kim

Key Result

AI-enabled QCG-Critical ECG score predicted 30-day postoperative mortality with AUROC 0.909, outperforming ESC surgical category (0.728) and RCRI (0.725).

Key Points

  • Evaluate the predictive ability of an AI-enabled ECG score for 30-day mortality in non-cardiac surgery.
  • Analyzed a retrospective cohort of 46,135 adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
  • Used preoperative ECG images to generate the QCG-Critical score via a CNN-based deep-learning algorithm.
  • Compared the QCG-Critical score's performance against traditional risk-assessment tools.
  • 30-day mortality occurred in 0.34% of patients analyzed.
  • Higher QCG-Critical scores (>40) were associated with a mortality rate of 11.7%.
  • The QCG-Critical score had an AUROC of 0.909 for predicting 30-day mortality, outperforming conventional tools.

Structured PICO

Does an AI-enabled ECG (QCG-Critical score) improve the prediction of 30-day postoperative mortality in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery compared to traditional risk-assessment tools?

P
Population
46,135 adults who underwent non-cardiac surgery at a tertiary centre between 2020 and 2021
I
Intervention
AI-enabled ECG (QCG-Critical score) generated from preoperative ECG images acquired within 30 days before surgery
C
Comparator
Traditional perioperative risk-assessment tools (ESC surgical category, Revised Cardiac Risk Index [RCRI], and ASA classification)
O
Outcome
30-day postoperative mortalityhard clinical

An AI-enhanced ECG score (QCG-Critical) accurately predicts 30-day postoperative mortality in non-cardiac surgery, outperforming traditional risk scores like RCRI and the ESC surgical category.

Abstract

Abstract Aims The role of electrocardiography (ECG) has been limited in the preoperative risk evaluation in noncardiac surgery due to its low prognostic value. We aimed to evaluate the utility of an AI-enabled ECG (QCG-Critical score) in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality in non-cardiac surgery and compare its performance with traditional perioperative risk-assessment tools. Methods and results A retrospective cohort of 46 135 adults who underwent non-cardiac surgery at a tertiary centre between 2020 and 2021 was analysed. Preoperative ECG images acquired within 30 days before surgery were used as input to previously developed CNN-based deep-learning algorithm to generate QCG-Critical score that reflects the risk for critical illness. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, which occurred in 0.34% of patients. Individuals with QCG-Critical scores 40 had a markedly higher mortality rate of 11.7%. The QCG-Critical score demonstrated strong predictive performance for 30-day mortality (AUROC: 0.909), outperforming the ESC surgical category (0.728) and RCRI (0.725), and was comparable to the ASA classification (0.886). The performance of QCG-Critical score remained consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, emergency operation, anaesthesia type, and conventional risk groups. The QCG-Critical score also demonstrated good performance for predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.933), unplanned PCI (0.857), prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.829), and presumed heart failure (0.774). Conclusion The preoperative QCG-Critical score accurately predicted postoperative mortality and other adverse outcomes, outperforming conventional risk-stratification tools. The QCG-Critical score may serve as a fast, accessible, and integrable tool for perioperative risk assessments in routine surgical care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question. AI-enabled QCG-Critical ECG score predicted 30-day postoperative mortality with AUROC 0.909, outperforming ESC surgical category (0.728) and RCRI (0.725).

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011a12ccff479cfe588a1https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper