PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond barriers: a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol of South Asian involvement in mental health research in high-income countries

NKNilam A. KhanPCPeter A. CoventryHAH. Ben Sik Ali

Key Points

  • The aim is to synthesize qualitative evidence on South Asian involvement in mental health research, focusing on participation and barriers.
  • Search 10 databases for qualitative studies related to South Asian participation in mental health research.
  • Use search terms focused on South Asia, ethnic minorities, mental health conditions, barriers, and facilitators.
  • Employ meta-ethnographic approaches to analyze and code qualitative data.
  • Extract demographic data and thematic outputs from selected studies.
  • Identifies gaps in current research regarding South Asian individuals' experiences with mental health studies.
  • Acknowledges the existing barriers and facilitators that affect participation in high-income countries.
  • Aims to generate new insights into the intersectionality of mental health and South Asian ethnicity.

Abstract

Introduction There is a recognised need to provide equity in healthcare through inclusion of ethnic minorities in research. South Asians, the largest ethnic minority group in the UK, experience high levels of mental illness, often against the backdrop of socioeconomic deprivation and discrimination. The research community recognises that South Asian communities are often excluded from health research. Efforts have been made to understand the barriers and facilitators to their participation. However, the participation of individuals at the intersection of mental ill health and South Asian ethnicity remains understudied. This is a protocol for the synthesis of qualitative evidence from mental health research studies about participation, motivation and barriers to recruitment of South Asians in high-income countries. Methods and analysis We will search 10 databases for qualitative evidence on participation of South Asian individuals in mental health research studies in high-income countries: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium, Social Policy and Practice, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Citation Index. Search terms for the following five concepts will be used: (1) South Asia, (2) ethnic minority, (3) mental health conditions, (4) barriers and facilitators to participation and (5) high-income countries. No date restriction will be applied to the search. Searches will be limited to studies in the English language. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two researchers independently, using Covidence. Demographic data, thematic outputs and salient discussion points will be extracted from final full-text inclusions and entered into NVivo for coding. Meta-ethnographic approaches using first and second-order constructs from included studies will be used to form third-order constructs. This synthesis will generate new knowledge regarding the intersectionality of mental health and South Asian ethnicity. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as this study is a synthesis of published data. This review will provide new knowledge regarding the requirements for researchers and practitioners to advance the involvement of South Asian populations in mental health research. This will undoubtedly enhance equity in the long term, reduce the burden of mental disorders and enable the provision of more effective mental health care for South Asian communities. PROSPERO registration number CRD42025626382.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699012032ccff479cfe58b35https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109567
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement2015 · 27,011 citations
  2. 2Epistemic injustice and mental health research: A pragmatic approach to working with lived experience expertise2023 · 106 citations
  3. 3Reducing systematic review workload through certainty-based screening2014 · 207 citations
  4. 4“I Will Do It If It Will Help Others:” Motivations Among Patients Taking Part in Qualitative Studies in Palliative Care2008 · 105 citations
  5. 5PT31 Self-Rated Health: Predictors of Poor Health Status and Associations With 5-Year Mortality Among UK Adults2024 · 1 citations