PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy0 citations

The Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Intervention to Promote Early Mobilization for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

View Full Paper
JSJamie SavitzkyATAngelo ToroFVFarley Villarente

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the impact of a JH-AMP-inspired intervention on mobility levels in an ICU setting.
  • Conducted a retrospective review of a multidisciplinary quality improvement project.
  • Compared ICU admissions before and after implementing the intervention.
  • Assessed the percentage of patients achieving JH-HLM ≥3 as the primary outcome.
  • 35.0% of the intervention group achieved JH-HLM ≥3 compared to 24.1% in the pre-intervention group.
  • Unadjusted odds ratio of achieving mobility was 1.70; adjusted odds ratio was 2.16 after controlling for confounders.
  • Statistical significance was confirmed with p-values less than 0.0001.

Abstract

Purpose: No published studies have described implementing a Johns Hopkins Activity and Mobility Promotion (JH-AMP) -inspired early mobilization initiative in an intensive care unit (ICU) serving a racially and socioeconomically diverse patient population. We hypothesized that a JH-AMP -modeled intervention would increase the proportion of patients achieving a Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) ≥3, a threshold for clinically meaningful mobility in the ICU, compared with pre-intervention care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a multidisciplinary quality improvement project. ICU admissions from April 4, 2021 to April 3, 2022 served as the pre-intervention group (N=769), and admissions from April 4, 2022 to April 4, 2023 served as the intervention group (N=930). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved JH-HLM ≥3 at any point during their ICU admission. Results: Patients in the intervention group were more likely to achieve JH-HLM ≥3 during their ICU stay (35.0% vs 24.1%; unadjusted OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.37 -2.10; P<.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, this association remained significant (adjusted OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.58 -2.95; P<.0001). Conclusions: Implementation of this multidisciplinary intervention improved mobility among patients who are critically ill ICU and supports feasibility of early mobility practices in diverse settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Savitzky et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699012032ccff479cfe58ba7https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000279
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper