PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Phase 1 Dose Escalation of Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

View Full Paper
CCConnie D. CaoJMJoseph Robert McCorkleDYDonglin Yan

Key Points

  • To determine the recommended phase 2 dose of paclitaxel and lapatinib in recurrent ovarian cancer.
  • Conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation study using Bayesian optimal interval design
  • Patients received weekly paclitaxel and pretreated with pulsed lapatinib
  • Evaluated three lapatinib doses (750 to 2000 mg) for toxicity and efficacy
  • Median of three prior therapies in patients
  • Overall response rate was 50%, with one complete response and seven partial responses
  • Common adverse effects included diarrhea, leukopenia, and anemia

Abstract

Objective: The development of ABCB1-mediated resistance limits the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel. Lapatinib is a small-molecule reversible tyrosine kinase and ABCB1 inhibitor that could prevent resistance. Our objective was to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of paclitaxel and lapatinib. Methods: A phase 1 dose-escalation study utilizing a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design in recurrent ovarian cancer patients was conducted. Patients were pretreated with pulsed lapatinib in the 48 h preceding weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in 28-day cycles for up to three cycles. We evaluated three lapatinib doses, escalating from 750 to 2000 mg orally twice daily. Results: Sixteen patients were eligible and evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Patients received a median of three prior therapies. Three patients were treated at dose level 1, six at dose level 2, and seven at dose level 3. There was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in dose level 2 (diarrhea) and another in dose level 3 (neutropenia), with a posterior DLT estimate of 0.17, 95% credible interval of (0.01, 0.53) for dose level 3 based on isotonic regression. The most common grade 1–2 adverse effects were diarrhea (87.5%), leukopenia (56.3%), and anemia (50%). One (6.25%) patient had a complete response, and seven (43.75%) patients had partial responses for an overall response rate (ORR) of 50%. The clinical responses are supported by a significant decreasing trend in CA 125 over six cycles (p = 0.0001). Among the seven patients treated at the RP2D, the ORR was 71.4%. Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel and lapatinib was safe and demonstrated an efficacy signal. The RP2D was weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 combined with lapatinib 2000 mg twice daily two days before the paclitaxel dose. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04608409.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699264d1eb1f82dc367a09e7https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18040626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper