PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Military Medicine0 citations

Return to Duty Rates in Active-Duty Military: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Open Cervical Spine Surgery

View Full Paper
EGElder GrangerKAKaitlyn ArmstrongUniversity of MississippiCFCorbit FranksUniversity of Mississippi

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare return-to-duty rates between minimally invasive and open cervical spine surgeries in active-duty military personnel.
  • Retrospective examination of outcomes among 156 active-duty or reserve military patients
  • Comparison between outpatient minimally invasive cervical spine surgery and open surgery
  • Analysis included return-to-duty rates and patient-centric outcomes.
  • 77% of service members returned to duty in less than 1 month
  • 19% returned to duty in 1-2 months
  • 4% returned to duty between 2-3 months
  • Significant reductions in visual analog scale and neck disability index were reported

Abstract

Abstract Background Military medical readiness plays a significant role in global military operations. While the severity of combat-related trauma is evident, musculoskeletal injuries (MSK’s), are the largest medical threat to deployment readiness, and accounted for more than 60% of limited duty days in 2019. Across MSK’s, the spine (lumbosacral: 30%; cervical: 22%; thoracic: 10%) accounts for 62% of MSKs. In the military population, there is a tremendous economic impact in training, retaining, and deploying a service member. Return-to-duty (RTD) rates and length of time for the treatment protocols for spine surgery vary significantly in published research. Research suggests RTD rates between 3-17 months following elective traditional open lumbar and cervical spine surgery, with a RTD rate of 64% within 1 year. When examining minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery (MIS), 100% of military personal had a RTD within 3 months. Research has yet to examine the impact of MIS of the cervical spine on the RTD rates of active-duty military. Methods The current study retrospectively examined surgical outcomes, return to duty, and patient-centric outcomes among 156 active duty or reserve military patients who underwent an outpatient minimally invasive (n = 79) cervical spine surgery or an open (n = 77) (Laminotomy/Foraminotomy/Decompression) for the treatment of cervical spinal stenosis. Results Significant reductions in visual analog scale of 3.31 and neck disability index of 16.01 were observed from preoperative to postoperative time points. 77% of service members RTD in less than 1 month, 19% RTD in 1-2 months and 4% RTD between 2-3 months. There were insignificant differences reported in the open surgery group. Discussions MIS has been shown to reduce tissue trauma and patient complications. MIS procedures have resulted in reducing postoperative stress responses and improving the recovery process following surgery. In the active-duty military population this plays an important role in return to duty quickness. Our findings suggest that MIS procedures in an ambulatory surgery center on the cervical spine result in improved patient outcomes and reduced RTD time in active-duty military personnel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Granger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926503eb1f82dc367a0e48https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usag014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper